W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

agenda: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:12:44 -0500
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1098112364.30433.858.camel@dirk>
1. Convene, take roll, review record and agenda

  RDF Data Access Working Group
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
  Tuesday 2004-10-19 10:30am-12:30pm/14:30-16:30 UTC
  Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD")
  http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343
  supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
    log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/10/19-dawg-irc

roll call
Scribe: Simon Raboczi
Regrets: Andy Seaborne (?)

PROPOSED: to accept
 minutes for 10-12-2004 meeting
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0132.html
as a true record of our meeting 2004-10-12


next meeting: Tuesday, October 26, 2004
  scribe volunteer, please?

propose to continue these 2 without discussion:

ACTION KendallC: expose our walking tour data to SPARQL querying clients
 ETA before F2F4
ACTION EricP: find logistics re F2F5 at tech plenary in Boston March
 28 Feb - 4 Mar (2 days).  Some WG preference to Mon/Tue of that week.

and note this done without discussion:

 ACTION DanC: talk with Kendall about issues list maintenance 

changes to the agenda?


2. Publication of SPARQL design and Data Access UC&R

woohoo!

 SPARQL Query Language for RDF
 http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20041012/

 RDF Data Access Use Cases and Requirements
 http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-rdf-dawg-uc-20041012/


3. Feedback on the SPARQL design

 [Fwd: Coments on first working draft of SPARQL] 
 Seaborne, Andy (Sunday, 17 October)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0130.html

and a few others.

ACTION: PatH review SPARQL def'ns post-publication

ACTION Dirk: provide details about DB interfaces, re '?' and '$'

To what extent are these issues addressed by the 12Oct drafts?

ACTION AlbertoR: owns issue 'DESCRIBE'

ACTION SteveH: own (i.e. propose resolution to) disjunction issue

ACTION SteveH: owns issue 'nested optionals'

ACTION: Tom to send sample iTQL queries and result formats for
subqueries vs. disjunction

ACTION DanC: owner of issue 'yes or no questions'


4. Web Services Constraints and Capabilities

ACTION EricP: draft UC on overlap between RDF query and web service
constraints with respect to WS-Policy continues.


5. SOURCE

ACTION: SteveH to turn his SOURCE tests into SPARQL ones

dawg-source-simple-* Steve Harris (Friday, 15 October)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0124.html

ACTION DaveB: Update the source section 9, add more formal links,
update the examples, try to think about extra constraints as EricP
proposed (SOURCE ?s and ?s only in in SELECT). Look at various
people's source test cases.





-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Monday, 18 October 2004 15:11:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:21 GMT