W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

RE: Comments in SPARQL

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 11:58:08 -0000
Message-ID: <8D5B24B83C6A2E4B9E7EE5FA82627DC94D2EA4@sdcexcea01.emea.cpqcorp.net>
To: "Alberto Reggiori" <alberto@asemantics.com>, "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>




-------- Original Message --------
> From: Alberto Reggiori <>
> Date: 2 November 2004 11:16
> 
> On Nov 2, 2004, at 12:10 PM, Dave Beckett wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 11:08:08 +0000, Dave Beckett
> > <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > > ... C/C++ style or # scripty style.  My only mild preference
> > > is the former since I've implemented it.  A +0.
> > 
> > I've just noticed I also do #-comments.  But really, pick one style.
> 
> we allow any of these:
> 
> /* style
> multi-line
> comments */
> 
> // C++ single line comments
> 
> # shell/Perl single line comments
> 
> but I agree, we need to pick one style for the final spec - but nice
to
> have at least a multi-line format when queries become long to type
> in....

Currently, I do the same - allow /* */, // and # comments.

Pref (+0) allow all three.  If there has to be one, then it feels more
scripty to me so #.
(Emacs supports commenting in and out blocks of line in all three
styles)

	Andy

> 
> Alberto
> 
> -
> Alberto Reggiori, Senior Partner, R&D @Semantics S.R.L.
> alberto@asemantics.com  www.asemantics.com
> Milan Office, milano@asemantics.com,   +39 0332 667092
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2004 11:58:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:21 GMT