W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:17:40 +0100
Message-ID: <416A79E4.4050207@hp.com>
To: Simon Raboczi <raboczi@tucanatech.com>
Cc: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org



Simon Raboczi wrote:
>>>(Section 11 and further tomorrow...)
> 
> 
> These are my final few comments.  I support publishing the document as 
> a WD.
> 
> ===
> 
> [[ 1.107 -- 11.2 Constructing an Output Graph
> The CONSTRUCT form returns an RDF graph specified by either a graph 
> template or by "*".  If a graph template is supplied...
> ]]
> 
> "Graph template" should be "graph pattern", or should at least be 
> defined to be the use of a graph pattern in this particular syntactic 
> position.

Nack - it isn't a fully general "graph pattern" at this point:

1/ Its only a conjunctive pattern - no optionals, disjunctions, unsaids.
2/ It may also include bNodes as constants of the query.
    This is an issue on the issue list.

So I prefer a new term.  It will be better defined post-publication.

> 
> ===


> 
> [[ 1.107 -- A. SPARQL Grammar
> This grammar is defines the allowable constructs in a SPARQL query.  ...
> ]]
> 
> -is

v1.111
Done

> 
> ===
> 
> [[ 1.107 -- B. References
> [1] " Three Implementations of SquishQL, a Simple RDF Query Language",
> ]]
> 
> Spurious space before the quote.

v 1.111
Done

> 
> ===
> 

Thanks for the comments

	Andy
Received on Monday, 11 October 2004 12:17:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:21 GMT