W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 26 Oct

From: Alberto Reggiori <alberto@asemantics.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:23:43 +0200
Message-Id: <BB304DDE-2730-11D9-9F6B-0011242E4018@asemantics.com>
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

On Oct 25, 2004, at 8:21 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:

> 1. Convene, take roll, review record and agenda
>
>   RDF Data Access Working Group
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
>   Tuesday 2004-10-26 10:30am-12:30pm/14:30-16:30 UTC
>   Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD")
>   http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343
>   supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>     log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/10/26-dawg-irc
>
> roll call
> Scribe: Tom Adams (with Alberto Reggiori as backup)

partial regrets - I will only be able to attend till 15:30 UTC (~60  
mins) today - need to go to doctor one hour away before dinner tonight

> Regrets: Andy Seaborne, Hiroyuki Sato
>
> PROPOSED: to accept
> minutes: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct (non-IRC version)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ 
> 0171.html
> as a true record.
>
> next meeting: Tuesday, October 26, 2004
>   scribe volunteer, please?

possible regrest for telecon 2/11/2004 - but if will be able to make it  
I can volunteer to scribe

Alberto

>
> propose to continue these 7 without discussion:
>
> ACTION KendallC: expose our walking tour data to SPARQL querying  
> clients
>  ETA before F2F4
> ACTION EricP: find logistics re F2F5 at tech plenary in Boston March
>  28 Feb - 4 Mar (2 days).  Some WG preference to Mon/Tue of that week.
>  some progress:
>   
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ 
> 0144.html
> ACTION AlbertoR: owns issue 'DESCRIBE'
> ACTION SteveH: own (i.e. propose resolution to) disjunction issue
> ACTION SteveH: owns issue 'nested optionals'
> ACTION DanC: owner of issue 'yes or no questions'
> ACTION DaveB: Update the source section 9, add more formal links,
> update the examples, try to think about extra constraints as EricP
> proposed (SOURCE ?s and ?s only in in SELECT). Look at various
> people's source test cases.
>
>
> changes to the agenda?
>
>
> 2. Web Services Constraints and Capabilities
>
> ACTION EricP: draft UC on overlap between RDF query and web service
> constraints with respect to WS-Policy
>
> Was this an action?
> "DaveB requested a summary of the WS requirements (e.g. conjunction  
> now,
> disjunction eventually), which Eric agreed to supply."
>
>
> 3. Feedback on the SPARQL design
>
> ACTION Dirk: provide details about DB interfaces, re '?' and '$'
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ 
> 0160.html
>
> ACTION: PatH review SPARQL def'ns post-publication
>
> definitions for SELECT, projection, substitution [was: [Fwd: Re: ...]]
> Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 19 October)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ 
> 0151.html
>
>
> 4. PREFIX syntax
> cf http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#prefixSyntax
>
> ACTION: DaveB to illustrate prefix interaction details by example/test
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ 
> 0161.html
> and following thread, including a proposal:
>
> [[
> 1. Remove the second PrefixDecl term from the Query term, so there
> is only one place prefixes are defined; before the ReportFormat term.
>
> 2. Change FromSelector to only allow URIs. Edit to be ::= QuotedURI
> or alternatively, put it inside FromClause, delete FromSelector.
>
> 3. Define prefix/URI expansion to happen in the order they are given
> in the syntax, with later prefixes overriding earlier ones.
> ]]
>
>
> 5. Toward adopting some tests
>
> Is this test ready?
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple-pattern-001
> i.e. every jot-and-tiddle of
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/simple/data-01.n3
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/simple/dawg-tp-01.rq
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/simple/result-tp-01.n3
>
> I don't see how the
>     rs:size     "2" ;
> is a consequence of the spec, for example.
>
> Is this documentation sufficient?
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/README.html
>
>
>
>
> p.s. sorry this is late; W3C AC meeting, TAG duties
> got in the way of a timely agenda.
>
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>
-
Alberto Reggiori, Senior Partner, R&D @Semantics S.R.L.
alberto@asemantics.com  www.asemantics.com
Milan Office, milano@asemantics.com,   +39 0332 667092
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:23:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:21 GMT