I've updated the result formats I did 2004-09-28 described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0556.html to add a <variables> header describing the variable names as well as a form for returning blank nodes. In addition to those changes I wrote XQuery scripts for reading the two XML result formats and generating HTML tables with the bindings. This was pretty straightforward for both formats and I don't see that this gives a strong indication of a the choice between the two formats - schemaless or with schema. I still prefer the <foo>bar</foo> form as easier on the eyes than <var name="foo">bar</foo>. It's un-necessarily larger. Depends on how important schema validation is, I guess. So, attached to this message are the files: SPARQL query example.rq over Turtle data file data.n3 giving results formats: 1) XML file result1.xml and XQuery script result1-to-html.xq 2) XML file result2.xml and XQuery script result2-to-html.xq along with RelaxNG schemas result2.rnc, result2.rng and WXS schema result2.xsd Dave
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:21 GMT