W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: UNSAID + inference tests

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 13:55:00 -0600
To: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1103658900.3082.568.camel@dirk>

On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 18:44 +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 04:56:32PM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> > 
> > I've added the tests from
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0538.html
> > 
> > As http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-unsaid-001
> > 
> > I believe this completes my action from the 2004-12-21 telecon, assuming
> > the translation is correct
> 
> I've just read Andy's mail where he says UNSAID doesnt bind variables,
> that seems quite supprising to me (and makes UNSAID less useful, but much
> less painful to optimise), but I'l change the test to an ASK.

I was a little surprised too about UNSAID not binding variables too,
though it makes sense when I think about it.
It seems worthwhile to keep that test around too.

Please make a test out of the ASK and the SELECT.

And please make a test ouf of the 1st case from 0538 too, i.e.
the one that's not about UNSAID but about inference.

> I dont think its possible to ask that question (all the things that aren't
> of type :C2) without a binding UNSAID. Not that I think thats a bad thing
> :)
> 
> - Steve
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2004 19:54:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:21 GMT