W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: agenda: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:28:02 -0400
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20041019142802.GC6743@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 10:12:44AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> ACTION EricP: draft UC on overlap between RDF query and web service
> constraints with respect to WS-Policy continues.

Nothing custom, but the last section of "RDF For Web Service Policy
Assertions" [1] starts on it a bit. The problem is that the web
services folks haven't worked out their desired
expressivity. Proposals range from simple identification (logical
operations are wrapped into a new identifier, ala FredzAuthentication
^ JoezReliableMessaging turns into MyAuthReliableMsg) to all of
conjunction, disjunction, negation.

ws-policy [2], a leading contender, recently struck negation and now
offers conjunction and disjunction. ws-policy policies are compared
for equivilence or subsumption by examining the disjunctive normal
form of the policy expression. ala comparing
    FredzAuthentication ^ (JoezReliableMessaging v SuezTransactions)
    FredzAuthentication ^ SuezTransactions

[1] http://www.w3.org/2004/08/20-ws-pol-pos/#query
[2] http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/specification/ws-polfram/

office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
                        Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
                        5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
        +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
cell:   +1.857.222.5741 (does not work in Asia)

Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 14:28:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:45 UTC