Correction: Seaborne, Andy wrote: > <snip/> > > I did the following with cwm from CVS: > > file:X.n3 ----------------------- > @prefix : <X#> . > @prefix data: <http://example.org/data/> . > @prefix log: <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log#> . > > > { <file:D.n3> log:semantics ?g . > ?g log:includes { data:a data:b data:c } > } => { ?g a :graph } . > ----------------------- > file:D.n3 ----------------------- > @prefix : <http://example.org/data/> . > > :a :b :c . > ----------------------- > > then used "cwm X.n3 --think" to get: > > which gives ( I put prefixes back and stripped out other stuff like the rule: ) > > ( { data:a data:b data:c } ) a X:result . > > ?g is an N3 formula. Formulae (quoted graphs) are outside RDF (for better or > worse - I'm not making a judgement). > That should be: { <file:D.n3> log:semantics ?g . ?g log:includes { data:a data:b data:c } } => { ( ?g ) a :result } . ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I forgot to write out the emacs buffer. Apologies, AndyReceived on Tuesday, 12 October 2004 16:31:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:21 GMT