public-webapps@w3.org from April to June 2015 by date

Tuesday, 30 June 2015

• Re: [shadow-dom] ::before/after on shadow hosts Olli Pettay
• [shadow-dom] ::before/after on shadow hosts Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Ashley Gullen
• Re: [admin] Moving Custom Elements bugs to Github [Was: Re: Custom Elements bugs will be also migrated] Xiaoqian Wu
• Components F2F Anne van Kesteren

Monday, 29 June 2015

• [admin] WebEx has replaced Zakim Arthur Barstow
• [admin] Moving Custom Elements bugs to Github [Was: Re: Custom Elements bugs will be also migrated] Arthur Barstow

Friday, 26 June 2015

• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Ashley Gullen
• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Justin Novosad
• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Justin Novosad
• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Ashley Gullen
• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Ashley Gullen
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Wez

Thursday, 25 June 2015

• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Daniel Cheng
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Daniel Cheng
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Daniel Cheng
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Daniel Cheng
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Wez
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Wez
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Wez
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Justin Novosad
• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Justin Novosad
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Wez
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Wez
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Wez
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Wez
• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Ashley Gullen
• Custom Elements bugs will be also migrated. [Was: Re: Shadow DOM spec bugs will be migrated into GitHub issues] Hayato Ito

Wednesday, 24 June 2015

• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Kenneth Russell
• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Ashley Gullen
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Wez
• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Wez
• Detecting image encoding/decoding support Ashley Gullen
• Re: Subject=Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Ashley Gullen

Tuesday, 23 June 2015

• Subject=Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Justin Novosad
• PSA: publishing new WD of Service Workers on June 25 Arthur Barstow

Monday, 22 June 2015

• [Bug 28841] New: Incorporate changes suggested by Mixed Content bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 19 June 2015

• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Ashley Gullen
• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Ashley Gullen

Thursday, 18 June 2015

• RE: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Travis Leithead
• RE: [ime-api] [blink-dev] Removing IME API code from Blink Travis Leithead
• [html-imports] Static import in body tag Bang Seongbeom
• [Bug 26478] Use DOMRect instead of ClientRect bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent Aymeric Vitte
• Re: [manifest] Manifest for web application; review ... Kostiainen, Anssi

Wednesday, 17 June 2015

• Re: PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent Arthur Barstow
• [admin] Use public-patent-issues list for all patent discussions [Was: Need a list for "Extract Widget patent"] Arthur Barstow
• Re: PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent Aymeric Vitte
• Re: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Ashley Gullen
• RE: Async Image -> ImageData conversion Travis Leithead
• Async Image -> ImageData conversion Ashley Gullen
• Re: [manifest] Manifest for web application; review ... Kostiainen, Anssi
• [Bug 28823] New: Course of action even after Event Source retry failure. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 16 June 2015

• Re: [Clipboard] Web API for clipboard changes. Kelvin Poon
• RE: URL bugs and next steps Domenic Denicola
• Re: URL bugs and next steps Anne van Kesteren
• Re: URL bugs and next steps Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: URL bugs and next steps Anne van Kesteren
• URL bugs and next steps Philippe Le Hegaret

Monday, 15 June 2015

• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Mark Giffin

Tuesday, 16 June 2015

• Re: [Clipboard] Web API for clipboard changes. Arthur Barstow
• Re: [Clipboard] Web API for clipboard changes. James M. Greene
• Re: [service_worker] Notification constructor Anne van Kesteren

Monday, 15 June 2015

• [Bug 20257] IDBCursor should walk on secondary ordering of index value bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17681] [IndexedDB] Operations that raise multiple exceptions types should define order bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent Aymeric Vitte
• Re: [Clipboard] Web API for clipboard changes. Kelvin Poon
• [service_worker] Notification constructor Conrad Irwin
• DOMError -> DOMException Joshua Bell
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Erik Isaksen
• RE: Custom Elements: is="" Léonie Watson
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Bruce Lawson

Sunday, 14 June 2015

• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Tobie Langel
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Patrick H. Lauke

Saturday, 13 June 2015

• RE: Custom Elements: is="" Léonie Watson
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Alice Boxhall
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Bruce Lawson
• RE: Custom Elements: is="" Léonie Watson
• RE: Custom Elements: is="" Léonie Watson
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Bruce Lawson

Friday, 12 June 2015

• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Tobie Langel

Saturday, 13 June 2015

• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Paul Libbrecht
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Jonathan Kingston
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types James M. Greene

Friday, 12 June 2015

• RE: Custom Elements: is="" Léonie Watson
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Justin Fagnani
• Re: Writing spec algorithms in ES6? Anne van Kesteren

Thursday, 11 June 2015

• Re: Writing spec algorithms in ES6? Olli Pettay
• Re: Writing spec algorithms in ES6? Joshua Bell
• Re: Writing spec algorithms in ES6? Rick Waldron
• Re: Writing spec algorithms in ES6? Elliott Sprehn
• Re: Writing spec algorithms in ES6? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Writing spec algorithms in ES6? Erik Arvidsson
• RE: Writing spec algorithms in ES6? Domenic Denicola
• Re: Writing spec algorithms in ES6? Adam Klein
• Re: Writing spec algorithms in ES6? イアンフェッティ
• Re: Writing spec algorithms in ES6? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Joshua Peek
• Writing spec algorithms in ES6? Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Elliott Sprehn
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Daniel Cheng
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Wez
• [Bug 28577] [XMLHttpRequest] Throwing SecurityError on open() call for some kind of simple errors bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types James M. Greene
• Re: [Clipboard] Web API for clipboard changes. Arthur Barstow
• Re: [ime-api] [blink-dev] Removing IME API code from Blink Arthur Barstow
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Florian Bösch
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
• [TPAC2015] Registration is now open for Oct 26-30 meeting week; deadline October 7 Arthur Barstow

Wednesday, 10 June 2015

• Re: [clipboard API] platform integration stuff - in spec or out of scope? James M. Greene
• [Bug 25791] [new feature] Provide a way to opt out of authentication dialogs bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Arthur Barstow
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
• [Bug 25494] What is the status of UI Events document? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 9 June 2015

• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Ashley Gullen
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Paul Libbrecht
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Wez
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Paul Libbrecht
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Daniel Cheng
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Daniel Cheng
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Paul Libbrecht
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Daniel Cheng
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types James M. Greene
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Paul Libbrecht
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Daniel Cheng
• Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Olli Pettay
• Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types Daniel Cheng
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Alice Boxhall
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Justin Fagnani
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Travis Leithead
• Re: CORS performance proposal Nottingham, Mark
• Re: CORS performance proposal Anne van Kesteren
• Re: CORS performance proposal Nottingham, Mark
• Re: CORS performance proposal Martin Thomson
• Re: CORS performance proposal Nottingham, Mark
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Ryosuke Niwa

Monday, 8 June 2015

• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Alice Boxhall
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Alice Boxhall
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Justin Fagnani
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Alice Boxhall

Friday, 5 June 2015

• Re: [components] Isolated Imports and Foreign Custom Elements Dimitri Glazkov

Thursday, 4 June 2015

• Re: RfC: Style Sheet for Technical Reports; deadline July 7 Arthur Barstow

Tuesday, 2 June 2015

• [Clipboard] Web API for clipboard changes. Kelvin Poon

Wednesday, 3 June 2015

• Re: Better focus support for Shadow DOM 河内 隆仁
• [Bug 28054] Focus on shadow host should slide to its inner focusable node bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 2 June 2015

• [Bug 28652] [Shadow] Need Document.deepActiveElement bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 1 June 2015

• [manifest] Manifest for web application; review ... timeless
• [Bug 28735] New: "Introduced in this specification" in IDL not helpful bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28734] New: CustomEvent.initCustomEvent() is in DOM bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28733] New: FocusEvent.initFocusEvent is not needed for web compat bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28732] New: Bug filing script doesn't select the component bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28731] New: CompositionEvent constructor arguments name are atypical bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [charter] Discussions about HTMLWG charter and WebApps Arthur Barstow

Saturday, 30 May 2015

• Re: RfC: Style Sheet for Technical Reports; deadline July 7 Joshua Bell

Friday, 29 May 2015

• CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Storage 2nd Edition deadline June 3 [Was: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition] Arthur Barstow
• RfC: Style Sheet for Technical Reports; deadline July 7 Arthur Barstow

Thursday, 28 May 2015

• [admin] Need a list for "Extract Widget patent" [Was: Re: PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent] Arthur Barstow
• RE: [ime-api] [blink-dev] Removing IME API code from Blink Travis Leithead
• Re: PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent Aymeric Vitte
• Re: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21 Xiaoqian Wu
• Re: [ime-api] [blink-dev] Removing IME API code from Blink Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Shadow DOM spec bugs will be migrated into GitHub issues Hayato Ito

Wednesday, 27 May 2015

• Re: Shadow DOM spec bugs will be migrated into GitHub issues Tab Atkins Jr.
• RE: [ime-api] Fwd: [blink-dev] Removing IME API code from Blink Travis Leithead
• [Bug 23332] Support Binary Keys bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [ime-api] Fwd: [blink-dev] Removing IME API code from Blink Arthur Barstow
• Re: Shadow DOM spec bugs will be migrated into GitHub issues Hayato Ito
• [Bug 27418] [Shadow]: Need to define what .styleSheets actually does on a shadow root bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27375] [Shadow]: Define whether <style>s in shadow trees are loaded bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 26850] [Shadow]: Style element should specify when to create and add style sheet in shadow DOM bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27757] [Shadow]: how is the autofocus attribute supposed to be handled? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27379] [Shadow] How should element.requestFullscreen(); work in shadow dom bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27380] [Shadow] How should various document internal references work when SVG is being used in shadow DOM bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 26934] [Shadow]: How should Element.requestPointerLock() work in shadow DOM? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 26943] [Custom] Should attachedCallback/detachedCallback callbacks be called when element is added to / removed from shadom dom which is attached to a in-document host? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27325] [Shadow]: Figure out how session history should work for <iframe>s in shadow DOM bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 26845] [Shadow] "All other HTML elements in the shadow trees must behave as if they were part of the document tree." does not deal with the case when the host is not in the document tree bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 26365] [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25563] [Shadow]: Define the impact of ordering on relevant HTML elements bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28561] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27994] [Shadow]: Distribution needs to not be observable bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28564] [Shadow]: Event model bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 26365] [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 24638] [Shadow]: elementFromPoint should return the host when you hit a Text node bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28564] [Shadow]: Event model bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 26892] [Shadow]: Consider not using AT_TARGET more than once in the event path bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27418] [Shadow]: Need to define what .styleSheets actually does on a shadow root bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28564] [Shadow]: Event model bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28564] [Shadow]: Event model bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28560] [Shadow] investigate if there should be deepRelatedTargets and touch.deepTargets bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28549] [Shadow]: Add [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] to ShadowRoot.innerHTML bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28443] [Shadow]: Specify distribution in terms of event loop bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27775] [Shadow]: Define the behavior of *closed* shadow trees. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27965] [Shadow]: Shadow host with tabindex=-1, all descendent tree should be ignored for tab navigation bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27994] [Shadow]: Distribution needs to not be observable bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28446] [Shadow]: Consider removal of multiple shadow roots bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28493] [Shadow]: Have a common interface between Document and ShadowRoot bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28561] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27757] [Shadow]: how is the autofocus attribute supposed to be handled? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28564] [Shadow]: Event model bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27325] [Shadow]: Figure out how session history should work for <iframe>s in shadow DOM bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28564] [Shadow]: Event model bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25458] [Shadow]: The return type of Event.path should leverage WebIDL sequences bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28587] [Shadow]: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27844] [Shadow]: Element.createShadowRoot() throws an exception for some elements bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28591] [Shadow]: Figure out a good replacement for /deep/ in testing scenarios bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28444] [Shadow]: Make event retargeting optional bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28442] [Shadow]: Isolated Shadow trees bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28441] [Shadow]: Declarative Shadow DOM bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28079] [Shadow]: inappropriate reference to CSS3-UI nav-index spec in focus navigation order bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27401] [Shadow]: Fully explore composition bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 24639] [Shadow]: Each section on the spec needs examples bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 24181] [Shadow]: There's isn't a way to append shadow elements in SVG bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 25 May 2015

• RE: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API] Informal CfC on moving the SysApps TCP and UDP Socket API to a Community Group Nilsson, Claes1
• Shadow DOM spec bugs will be migrated into GitHub issues Hayato Ito

Saturday, 23 May 2015

• [Bug 16595] Ability to get non-sequential records from various operations bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 22 May 2015

• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Wilson Page
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Wilson Page

Thursday, 21 May 2015

• [Bug 27727] Remove DOMError from IDB bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent Aymeric Vitte
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Dimitri Glazkov
• RE: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Travis Leithead
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Anne van Kesteren

Wednesday, 20 May 2015

• [CSSWG][css-ui] Updated WD of CSS-UI L3 Florian Rivoal
• PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent Arthur Barstow
• [Bug 27844] [Shadow]: Element.createShadowRoot() throws an exception for some elements bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28659] [Shadow]: Remove Section 8. "HTML Elements and Their Shadow Trees" from the spec bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 19 May 2015

• [Bug 16103] Remove DOMStringList usage bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 26492] IndexedDB: add/put/update operations should define ordering of clone vs. keypath evaluation bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Elliott Sprehn
• RE: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Domenic Denicola
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Dimitri Glazkov
• PSA: HTML5 Web Messaging is a W3C Recommendation Arthur Barstow
• RE: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Domenic Denicola
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Philip Walton
• [Bug 28659] New: [Shadow]: Remove Section 8. "HTML Elements and Their Shadow Trees" from the spec bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Elliott Sprehn
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Elliott Sprehn
• RE: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Domenic Denicola
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Justin Fagnani
• [admin] Getting notification about WebApp's web-platform-tests activity? Arthur Barstow
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Domenic Denicola
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Elliott Sprehn
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Justin Fagnani

Monday, 18 May 2015

• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Philip Walton
• RE: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Domenic Denicola
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Justin Fagnani
• RE: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Domenic Denicola
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Daniel Freedman
• RE: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Domenic Denicola
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Dimitri Glazkov
• [Bug 28652] New: [Shadow] Need Document.deepActiveElement bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28562] [Shadow]: Introduce "deep tree" terminology bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Shadow DOM: state of the distribution API Hayato Ito

Sunday, 17 May 2015

• Re: [components] Isolated Imports and Foreign Custom Elements Maciej Stachowiak

Saturday, 16 May 2015

• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Steve Orvell
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Scott Miles
• Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Tab Atkins Jr.

Friday, 15 May 2015

• [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots? Scott Miles
• Registration now open Re: F2F Meeting: Custom Elements, 21 July, Bay Area California chaals@yandex-team.ru
• Re: Shadow DOM: state of the distribution API Olli Pettay
• Re: Shadow DOM: state of the distribution API Wilson Page
• Re: Shadow DOM: state of the distribution API Olli Pettay
• Re: Shadow DOM: state of the distribution API Wilson Page
• F2F Meeting: Custom Elements, 21 July, Bay Area California chaals@yandex-team.ru
• RE: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21 Zhang, Zhiqiang

Thursday, 14 May 2015

• Re: Directory Upload Proposal Jonas Sicking
• Re: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21 Kostiainen, Anssi
• CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21 Arthur Barstow
• Re: Directory Upload Proposal Jonas Sicking
• Re: Directory Upload Proposal Jonas Sicking

Wednesday, 13 May 2015

• Re: Directory Upload Proposal Michaela Merz
• RE: Directory Upload Proposal Ali Alabbas
• RE: Shadow DOM: state of the distribution API Travis Leithead
• Re: Shadow DOM: state of the distribution API Dimitri Glazkov

Tuesday, 12 May 2015

• Re: A Second Edition of Web Storage? [was: Re: Web Storage Rec errata?] chaals@yandex-team.ru
• Re: A Second Edition of Web Storage? [was: Re: Web Storage Rec errata?] Kostiainen, Anssi
• Re: A Second Edition of Web Storage? [was: Re: Web Storage Rec errata?] Arthur Barstow
• Re: A Second Edition of Web Storage? [was: Re: Web Storage Rec errata?] chaals@yandex-team.ru
• Re: A Second Edition of Web Storage? [was: Re: Web Storage Rec errata?] Arthur Barstow
• RE: Making ARIA and native HTML play better together Léonie Watson
• Re: Making ARIA and native HTML play better together Maciej Stachowiak
• [Bug 28564] [Shadow]: Event model bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 11 May 2015

• Re: Stability of Widget DigSig Arthur Barstow
• Re: Making ARIA and native HTML play better together Steve Faulkner
• RE: Stability of Widget DigSig Andrew Twigger

Sunday, 10 May 2015

• Re: Custom Elements: insert/remove callbacks Boris Zbarsky

Saturday, 9 May 2015

• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Alice Boxhall
• Re: Making ARIA and native HTML play better together Alice Boxhall
• Re: Custom Elements: insert/remove callbacks Elliott Sprehn
• Re: Custom Elements: insert/remove callbacks Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa

Friday, 8 May 2015

• Re: Directory Upload Proposal Jonas Sicking
• RE: Custom Elements: is="" Domenic Denicola
• RE: Custom Elements: is="" Travis Leithead
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Elliott Sprehn
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Justin Fagnani
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Justin Fagnani
• RE: Custom Elements: is="" Travis Leithead
• A Second Edition of Web Storage? [was: Re: Web Storage Rec errata?] Xiaoqian Wu
• Re: Custom Elements: insert/remove callbacks Adam Klein
• [widgets] implementation data [Was: Re: Stability of Widget DigSig] Arthur Barstow
• Re: Stability of Widget DigSig Marcos Caceres
• Re: Stability of Widget DigSig Arthur Barstow
• Re: Making ARIA and native HTML play better together Domenic Denicola
• Re: Stability of Widget DigSig Anders Rundgren
• Re: Custom Elements: insert/remove callbacks Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Stability of Widget DigSig Arthur Barstow
• Re: Stability of Widget DigSig Anders Rundgren
• Re: Stability of Widget DigSig Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Stability of Widget DigSig Marcos Caceres
• [clipboard] queryCommandEnabled() and before* events Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
• Re: Stability of Widget DigSig Arthur Barstow
• [Bug 28564] [Shadow]: Event model bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28560] [Shadow] investigate if there should be deepRelatedTargets and touch.deepTargets bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28558] [Shadow] Rename .path to .deepPath and make it hide closed shadow trees in case it is accessed from open/light DOM bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Custom Elements: insert/remove callbacks Elliott Sprehn
• Re: Custom Elements: insert/remove callbacks Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Custom Elements: insert/remove callbacks Elliott Sprehn
• Re: Custom Elements: insert/remove callbacks Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 5 May 2015

• You update XMLHttpRequest has a bug ★秋叶☆

Wednesday, 6 May 2015

• Re: Permissions API vs local APIs Miguel Garcia
• Re: Permissions API vs local APIs Miguel Garcia
• Re: Permissions API vs local APIs Miguel Garcia

Friday, 8 May 2015

• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Hayato Ito

Thursday, 7 May 2015

• Re: Making ARIA and native HTML play better together Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Making ARIA and native HTML play better together Patrick H. Lauke
• RfC: Subresource Integrity; deadline May 26 Arthur Barstow
• Re: Custom Elements: insert/remove callbacks Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Custom Elements: Upgrade et al Domenic Denicola
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Custom Elements: Upgrade et al Ryosuke Niwa
• Stability of Widget DigSig Andrew Twigger
• Re: Custom Elements: insert/remove callbacks Dominic Cooney
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Making ARIA and native HTML play better together Domenic Denicola
• Re: Custom Elements: insert/remove callbacks Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Making ARIA and native HTML play better together Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Making ARIA and native HTML play better together Steve Faulkner
• Re: Making ARIA and native HTML play better together Bruce Lawson
• Re: Shadow DOM: state of the distribution API Hayato Ito
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Hayato Ito
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Elliott Sprehn
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Anne van Kesteren
• Fwd: Making ARIA and native HTML play better together Steve Faulkner
• Re: Custom Elements: Upgrade et al Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Shadow DOM: state of the distribution API Hayato Ito
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Hayato Ito
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Hayato Ito
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Hayato Ito

Wednesday, 6 May 2015

• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Shadow DOM: state of the distribution API Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Shadow DOM: state of the distribution API Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Custom Elements: Upgrade et al Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Shadow DOM: state of the distribution API Elliott Sprehn
• Re: Custom Elements: insert/remove callbacks Justin Fagnani
• Re: Shadow DOM: state of the distribution API Jonas Sicking
• Re: Permissions API vs local APIs Marcos Caceres
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Elliott Sprehn
• Re: Permissions API vs local APIs Martin Thomson
• Re: Permissions API vs local APIs Mounir Lamouri
• Re: [clipboard] Add RTF to the "mandatory data types" list? Daniel Cheng
• Re: Permissions API vs local APIs Doug Turner
• Re: Shadow DOM: state of the distribution API Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Permissions API vs local APIs Jonas Sicking
• Re: Shadow DOM: state of the distribution API Jonas Sicking
• Re: Permissions API vs local APIs Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Alice Boxhall
• Re: Permissions API vs local APIs Anne van Kesteren
• [webcomponents]: Minutae -- moved proposals from wiki to /proposals Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Permissions API vs local APIs Doug Turner
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Domenic Denicola
• Re: Permissions API vs local APIs Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Custom Elements: Upgrade et al Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Permissions API vs local APIs Jonas Sicking
• Re: :host pseudo-class Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Custom Elements: insert/remove callbacks Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Custom Elements: is="" Steve Faulkner
• Re: Custom Elements: Upgrade et al Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Custom Elements: Upgrade et al Domenic Denicola
• RE: Custom Elements: is="" Léonie Watson
• Re: Custom Elements: insert/remove callbacks Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Shadow DOM: state of the distribution API Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: :host pseudo-class Tab Atkins Jr.
• Custom Elements: insert/remove callbacks Anne van Kesteren
• Custom Elements: Upgrade et al Anne van Kesteren
• Custom Elements: is="" Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 5 May 2015

• Re: Permissions API vs local APIs Erik Isaksen

Wednesday, 6 May 2015

• Re: Permissions API vs local APIs Michael van Ouwerkerk
• Shadow DOM: state of the distribution API Anne van Kesteren
• Re: :host pseudo-class Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Permissions API vs local APIs Anne van Kesteren
• [Bug 28614] New: Weaken the requirement of the time of running async steps bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa

Tuesday, 5 May 2015

• Re: Permissions API vs local APIs Mike West
• Re: Permissions API vs local APIs Jonas Sicking
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Austin William Wright
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: :host pseudo-class Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: :host pseudo-class Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Microsoft is considering Chrome's Native Messaging Anders Rundgren
• RE: Directory Upload Proposal Ali Alabbas
• Re: oldNode.replaceWith(...collection) edge case Anne van Kesteren
• Permissions API vs local APIs Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Elliott Sprehn
• Re: :host pseudo-class Anne van Kesteren
• Re: :host pseudo-class Jonas Sicking
• Re: :host pseudo-class Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Lea Verou
• Re: :host pseudo-class Tab Atkins Jr.

Monday, 4 May 2015

• RE: [components] Isolated Imports and Foreign Custom Elements Travis Leithead
• Re: [components] Isolated Imports and Foreign Custom Elements Anne van Kesteren

Friday, 1 May 2015

• Re: Shadow DOM Imperative API proposal #1 vs <content select/slot> Wilson Page

Saturday, 2 May 2015

• Re: [components] Isolated Imports and Foreign Custom Elements Maciej Stachowiak

Friday, 1 May 2015

• RE: [components] Isolated Imports and Foreign Custom Elements Domenic Denicola
• Re: [components] Isolated Imports and Foreign Custom Elements Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [components] Isolated Imports and Foreign Custom Elements Maciej Stachowiak
• Observers added to Performance Philippe Le Hegaret
• PSA: Martin Thomson joins Push API Editor team Arthur Barstow
• RE: [components] Isolated Imports and Foreign Custom Elements Travis Leithead
• Re: Shadow DOM Imperative API proposal #1 vs <content select/slot> Dimitri Glazkov
• [Bug 28591] New: [Shadow]: Figure out a good replacement for /deep/ in testing scenarios bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [components] Isolated Imports and Foreign Custom Elements Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Anne van Kesteren
• Shadow DOM Imperative API proposal #1 vs <content select/slot> Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Anne van Kesteren
• Re: :host pseudo-class Anne van Kesteren
• Re: :host pseudo-class Elliott Sprehn
• Re: :host pseudo-class Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Elliott Sprehn
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Hayato Ito
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Hayato Ito
• Re: :host pseudo-class Tab Atkins Jr.

Thursday, 30 April 2015

• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Brian Kardell
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Hayato Ito
• [Bug 28587] New: [Shadow]: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Hayato Ito
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Hayato Ito
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Domenic Denicola
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Domenic Denicola
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Domenic Denicola
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Web Storage Rec errata? Kostiainen, Anssi
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Hayato Ito
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Hayato Ito
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: :host pseudo-class Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Hayato Ito
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Ryosuke Niwa
• [Bug 28579] [Shadow]: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Hayato Ito
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Justin Fagnani

Wednesday, 29 April 2015

• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Nice version Re: Minutes of Shadow DOM meeting Dimitri Glazkov
• FYI: First Public Working Draft of Web Payments Use Cases Ian Jacobs
• Re: Why is querySelector much slower? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Why is querySelector much slower? Glen Huang
• Re: Directory Upload Proposal Jonas Sicking
• Re: Directory Upload Proposal Jonas Sicking
• Re: Directory Upload Proposal Jonas Sicking

Tuesday, 28 April 2015

• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Justin Fagnani
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• RE: Directory Upload Proposal Travis Leithead
• RE: Directory Upload Proposal Travis Leithead
• RE: Directory Upload Proposal Ali Alabbas
• Re: Directory Upload Proposal Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Directory Upload Proposal Ryan Seddon
• IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 29 April at 21:00Z Janina Sajka
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: =[xhr] Tab Atkins Jr.
• =[xhr] Ken Nelson
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Elliott Sprehn
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Ryosuke Niwa
• [Bug 28579] New: [Shadow]: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Hayato Ito
• RE: [components] Isolated Imports and Foreign Custom Elements Jonathan Bond-Caron
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Why is querySelector much slower? Boris Zbarsky
• [Bug 28353] [Shadow]: Use a parent/child relationship in the composed tree for some elements, i.e. <ol>/<li> bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Why is querySelector much slower? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Why is querySelector much slower? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Why is querySelector much slower? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Web Storage Rec errata? Arthur Barstow
• [selectors-api] How to mark TR version as obsolete/superseded? [Was: Re: Obsolete Document] Arthur Barstow
• Re: Why is querySelector much slower? Glen Huang
• Re: Why is querySelector much slower? Glen Huang
• Re: Why is querySelector much slower? Elliott Sprehn
• Re: Why is querySelector much slower? Glen Huang
• Re: Why is querySelector much slower? Glen Huang
• Re: Why is querySelector much slower? Glen Huang
• Re: Directory Upload Proposal Arun Ranganathan
• [Bug 28577] New: [XMLHttpRequest] Throwing NetworkError on open() call for some kind of simple errors bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Directory Upload Proposal Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 23726] Integration between XMLHttpRequest and Streams API bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Hayato Ito
• Re: Directory Upload Proposal Jonas Sicking
• Re: Why is querySelector much slower? Boris Zbarsky
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28522] [Shadow] Cascading for trees of no-inner/outer and no-younger/older relationship bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Exposing structured clone as an API? Elliott Sprehn
• Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM Revisited Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Why is querySelector much slower? Elliott Sprehn
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Hayato Ito
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Why is querySelector much slower? Glen Huang
• Re: Why is querySelector much slower? Glen Huang
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Why is querySelector much slower? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Steve Orvell
• Re: Exposing structured clone as an API? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Why is querySelector much slower? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Steve Orvell

Monday, 27 April 2015

• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Steve Orvell
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Hayato Ito
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Hayato Ito
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Steve Orvell
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Hayato Ito
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: :host pseudo-class Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Steve Orvell
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Olli Pettay
• Re: PSA: publishing new WD of Push API on April 30 Michael van Ouwerkerk
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Matthew Robb
• PSA: publishing new WD of Push API on April 30 Arthur Barstow
• Re: Limiting the scope of user permissions Frederik Braun
• Re: Limiting the scope of user permissions Anne van Kesteren
• Limiting the scope of user permissions Andy Earnshaw
• RE: Why is querySelector much slower? François REMY
• Re: Exposing structured clone as an API? Anne van Kesteren
• Why is querySelector much slower? Glen Huang
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Anne van Kesteren
• [Bug 28564] New: [Shadow]: Event model bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Justin Fagnani
• Re: :host pseudo-class Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Justin Fagnani
• Re: :host pseudo-class Rune Lillesveen
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Anne van Kesteren
• [Bug 28562] New: [Shadow]: Introduce "deep tree" terminology bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28561] New: [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: :host pseudo-class Anne van Kesteren
• Re: :host pseudo-class L. David Baron
• Re: :host pseudo-class Anne van Kesteren
• Re: :host pseudo-class L. David Baron
• Re: :host pseudo-class Anne van Kesteren
• [Bug 28445] [Shadow]: The default value of open/closed flag bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27325] [Shadow]: Figure out how session history should work for <iframe>s in shadow DOM bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: :host pseudo-class Hayato Ito
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Hayato Ito

Sunday, 26 April 2015

• Re: [clipboard] Feature detect Clipboard API support? Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
• [Bug 28560] New: [Shadow] investigate if there should be deepRelatedTarget and touch.deepTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [clipboard] Feature detect Clipboard API support? James M. Greene
• Nice version Re: Minutes of Shadow DOM meeting chaals@yandex-team.ru
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Olli Pettay

Saturday, 25 April 2015

• Re: Minutes of Shadow DOM meeting chaals@yandex-team.ru
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Olli Pettay
• Re: :host pseudo-class Daniel Tan
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Hayato Ito
• RE: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Travis Leithead
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Hayato Ito
• :host pseudo-class Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Minutes of Shadow DOM meeting Arthur Barstow
• Re: Minutes of Shadow DOM meeting Arthur Barstow
• Re: Minutes of Shadow DOM meeting Bjoern Hoehrmann
• [Shadow DOM] Use Cases for Selective Redistributions Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Ryosuke Niwa
• Minutes of Shadow DOM meeting chaals@yandex-team.ru

Friday, 24 April 2015

• Re: Exposing structured clone as an API? Brendan Eich
• Re: Exposing structured clone as an API? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: JSON imports? Erik Isaksen
• Re: Exposing structured clone as an API? Joshua Bell
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Exposing structured clone as an API? Anne van Kesteren
• [Bug 28558] New: [Shadow] Rename .path to .deepPath and make it hide closed shadow trees in case it is accessed from open/light DOM bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: PSA: publishing new WD of UI Events and D3E Keyboard specs April 28/30 Arthur Barstow
• Re: PSA: publishing new WD of UI Events and D3E Keyboard specs April 28/30 Кошмарчик
• PSA: publishing new WD of UI Events and D3E Keyboard specs April 28/30 Arthur Barstow
• [Bug 27986] Specify exact length of array returned by Navigator.getGamepads() bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27444] Gamepad objects should have a dictionary of attributes about the controller and data source bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 26203] Order in which index entries should be reused is unspecified bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25203] [gamepad] Connected Attribute appears to serve no purpose if the Gamepad object is a snapshot bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25202] [gamepad] "id" property is unclear how its established bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17309] It is not defined what the value of Gamepad.index should be after disconnecting the gamepad bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21434] Need to spec liveness of Gamepad objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21387] Need to spec better support for control mapping bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21386] Should specify how to present d-pads/triggers as buttons bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17309] It is not defined what the value of Gamepad.index should be after disconnecting the gamepad bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Exposing structured clone as an API? Robin Berjon
• Web Components Viewpoint from the Microsoft Guy Travis Leithead
• Re: [components] Apple's consolidated feedback on Web Components Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Exposing structured clone as an API? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Exposing structured clone as an API? Kyle Huey
• Re: Exposing structured clone as an API? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Directory Upload Proposal Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Exposing structured clone as an API? Anne van Kesteren
• [Bug 28353] [Shadow]: Use a parent/child relationship in the composed tree for some elements, i.e. <ol>/<li> bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 23 April 2015

• Re: Exposing structured clone as an API? Martin Thomson
• Re: Exposing structured clone as an API? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Exposing structured clone as an API? Elliott Sprehn
• Re: Exposing structured clone as an API? Martin Thomson
• Exposing structured clone as an API? Ted Mielczarek
• [Bug 28552] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27325] [Shadow]: Figure out how session history should work for <iframe>s in shadow DOM bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [clipboard] Dilemma: getData('text/html') and useful CF_HTML quirks Ted Mielczarek
• [Bug 28491] [Shadow]: [Meta] Unblock Mozilla's shipping of Shadow DOM bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28353] [Shadow]: Use a parent/child relationship in the composed tree for some elements, i.e. <ol>/<li> bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Directory Upload Proposal Ali Alabbas
• [Bug 28440] [Shadow]: Layout Containment and Shadow Trees bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 24861] [Shadow]: Add a way to detect when the list of nodes distributed to an insertion point mutates bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [components] Isolated Imports and Foreign Custom Elements Maciej Stachowiak
• [Bug 28539] [Shadow]: Typos Spefifies and Speficies bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [clipboard] Dilemma: getData('text/html') and useful CF_HTML quirks Daniel Cheng
• [Bug 28246] [Shadow]: Disable event capturing through a ShadowRoot bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28552] New: [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11350] [IndexedDB] ObjectStores should have a way to hint that they're "evictable" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 16595] Ability to get non-sequential records from various operations bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17681] [IndexedDB] Operations that raise multiple exceptions types should define order bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20257] IDBCursor should walk on secondary ordering of index value bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 22370] Inform script of corruption-induced data loss bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 23332] Support Binary Keys bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19955] [IndexedDB] Add IDBObjectStore.openKeyCursor bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19955] [IndexedDB] Add IDBObjectStore.openKeyCursor bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28549] New: [Shadow]: Add [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] to ShadowRoot.innerHTML bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [clipboard] Dilemma: getData('text/html') and useful CF_HTML quirks Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
• =[xhr] Charles Perry
• Re: [components] Apple's consolidated feedback on Web Components Maciej Stachowiak
• [components] Apple's consolidated feedback on Web Components Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Justin Fagnani
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Jan Miksovsky

Wednesday, 22 April 2015

• [Bug 28547] New: Remove the support for inherting from builtin subclasses of HTMLElement and SVGElement bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28546] New: document.registerElement should take a template as an argument bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28545] New: Declarative syntax for custom elements bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28544] New: Custom elements should not upgrade elements by setting prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Jan Miksovsky
• [Bug 28543] New: Custom elements should call user defined constructor synchronously bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28542] New: [Shadow] Replace node distribution mechanism by the named slot proposal bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28541] New: Custom elements should use ES6 class constructor bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• RE: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Travis Leithead
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Olli Pettay
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Hayato Ito
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Justin Fagnani
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Erik Bryn
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Tab Atkins Jr.
• [Bug 28539] New: [Shadow]: Typos Spefifies and Speficies bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Justin Fagnani
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Justin Fagnani
• RE: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Domenic Denicola
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Brian Kardell
• Proposed W3C CG - The Extended Web Anders Rundgren
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Ryosuke Niwa
• RE: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Domenic Denicola
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Justin Fagnani
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Brian Kardell
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Daniel Freedman
• Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: JSON imports? Glen Huang
• Re: [clipboard] Feature detect Clipboard API support? Ryan Seddon

Tuesday, 21 April 2015

• Re: [admin] Registration for April 24 2015 Web Components f2f meeting; deadline April 10 Arthur Barstow
• Re: XMLHttpRequest and timing of upload events Anne van Kesteren
• Web Storage Rec errata? Kostiainen, Anssi
• Re: [clipboard] Feature detect Clipboard API support? Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
• [Bug 28522] New: [Shadow] Cascading for trees of no-inner/outer and no-younger/older relationship bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [clipboard] Add RTF to the "mandatory data types" list? James M. Greene
• Re: [clipboard] Feature detect Clipboard API support? James M. Greene

Monday, 20 April 2015

• Re: [clipboard events] click-to-copy support could be hasFeature discoverable? Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
• Re: [clipboard] Feature detect Clipboard API support? Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
• Re: [clipboard events] seeking implementor feedback on using CID: URI scheme for pasting embedded binary data Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
• Re: XMLHttpRequest and timing of upload events Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
• Re: [clipboard events] seeking implementor feedback on using CID: URI scheme for pasting embedded binary data Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
• Re: [clipboard] Add RTF to the "mandatory data types" list? Paul Libbrecht
• Re: [clipboard] Add RTF to the "mandatory data types" list? Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
• Re: [webcomponents]: Let's reach consensus on Shadow DOM Dimitri Glazkov

Sunday, 19 April 2015

• Re: JSON imports? Elliott Sprehn

Saturday, 18 April 2015

• Re: JSON imports? Glen Huang
• [admin] Updating our /TR stylesheets Arthur Barstow
• Re: JSON imports? Elliott Sprehn
• Re: JSON imports? Glen Huang
• Re: JSON imports? Elliott Sprehn

Friday, 17 April 2015

• [Bug 28505] New: Synchronous XHR removal makes patching Error.prepareStackTrace impossible bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript Adam Klein
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript Martin Thomson
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript Richard Barnes
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript Richard Barnes
• Re: JSON imports? Glen Huang
• Re: JSON imports? Wilson Page
• Re: JSON imports? Matthew Robb
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript Ashley Gullen
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript Elliott Sprehn
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript Mike West
• Privileged context features and JavaScript Anne van Kesteren
• JSON imports? Glen Huang

Thursday, 16 April 2015

• [Bug 28502] New: Add file event watching. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• RE: [Imports] Considering imperative HTML imports? Travis Leithead
• Re: [Imports] Considering imperative HTML imports? Anne van Kesteren
• RE: [Imports] Considering imperative HTML imports? Travis Leithead
• Re: [Imports] Considering imperative HTML imports? Boris Zbarsky
• PSA: publishing new WD of Clipboard APIs and events on April 21 Arthur Barstow
• Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Are there any plans to make IndexedDB and promises play nice? Joshua Bell
• Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [Imports] Considering imperative HTML imports? Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [Imports] Considering imperative HTML imports? Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM Wilson Page
• Re: Are there any plans to make IndexedDB and promises play nice? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [Imports] Considering imperative HTML imports? Elliott Sprehn

Wednesday, 15 April 2015

• Are there any plans to make IndexedDB and promises play nice? Jeremy Scheff

Thursday, 16 April 2015

• Re: [Imports] Considering imperative HTML imports? Dominic Cooney
• [Imports] Considering imperative HTML imports? Travis Leithead
• Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM Elliott Sprehn

Wednesday, 15 April 2015

• [Bug 28496] New: Allow Blob constructor to take ownership of ArrayBuffer(View) / invoke DetachArrayBuffer bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21 Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21 Arthur Barstow
• Re: PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21 Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21 Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21 Arthur Barstow
• Re: IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 15 April at 21:00Z Andy Heath
• Re: PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21 Martin Thomson
• Re: PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21 Arthur Barstow
• Re: PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21 Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21 Arthur Barstow
• PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21 Arthur Barstow
• Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM Anne van Kesteren
• RfC: LCWD of Media Capture and Streams; deadline May 15 Arthur Barstow
• [Bug 27829] [Shadow]: Update ShadowRoot to have elementsFromPoint and caretPositionFromPoint bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28493] New: [Shadow]: Have a common interface between Document and ShadowRoot bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21066] Provide an event path API bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27637] [Shadow]: Explain the CSS inheritance in terms of Composed Tree bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27359] [Shadow]: Need to define interaction with directionality bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 14 April 2015

• IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 15 April at 21:00Z Janina Sajka
• Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM Daniel Freedman
• Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM Daniel Freedman
• Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM Dimitri Glazkov
• [Bug 28491] New: [Shadow]: [Meta] Unblock Mozilla's shipping of Shadow DOM bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: WebIDL Plans Boris Zbarsky
• Re: PSA: Seeking feedback on W3C's "Modern Tooling" project Melvin Carvalho
• Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM Anne van Kesteren
• PSA: Seeking feedback on W3C's "Modern Tooling" project Arthur Barstow
• Re: WebIDL Plans Yves Lafon
• [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API] Informal CfC on moving the SysApps TCP and UDP Socket APi to a Community Group Nilsson, Claes1

Monday, 13 April 2015

• Re: PSA: publishing new WD of Gamepad on April 14 Ted Mielczarek
• Re: [clipops][editing] document.execCommand('copy', false, 'some data') ? Aryeh Gregor
• Re: [clipops][editing] document.execCommand('copy', false, 'some data') ? Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
• Re: WebIDL Plans Arthur Barstow
• Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM Anne van Kesteren

Sunday, 12 April 2015

• Re: WebIDL Plans Anne van Kesteren

Saturday, 11 April 2015

• Re: [clipops][editing] document.execCommand('copy', false, 'some data') ? Aryeh Gregor
• Re: PSA: publishing new WD of Gamepad on April 14 Florian Bösch

Friday, 10 April 2015

• Re: [clipops][editing] document.execCommand('copy', false, 'some data') ? Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
• Re: [clipops][editing] document.execCommand('copy', false, 'some data') ? Daniel Cheng
• Re: WebIDL Plans Boris Zbarsky
• Re: PSA: publishing new WD of Gamepad on April 14 Ashley Gullen
• RE: WebIDL Plans Domenic Denicola
• WebIDL Plans Yves Lafon
• [clipops][editing] document.execCommand('copy', false, 'some data') ? Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
• [Bug 28460] New: Request fullscreen on both iframe and elements inside it could cause undesired result bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28459] New: Algorithm of exitFullscreen() doesn't work correctly when there are nested fullscreen element bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 9 April 2015

• [Bug 28456] New: nested keyPath: allow specification which part should be iterated if it's an array bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: PSA: publishing new WD of Gamepad on April 14 Florian Bösch
• Re: PSA: publishing new WD of Gamepad on April 14 Ashley Gullen
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? Elliott Sprehn
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced? Rahly
• [gamepad] UA applied mapping cannot be escaped [Was: Re: PSA: publishing new WD of Gamepad on April 14] Arthur Barstow
• Re: HTML Import for Web Designers Janusz Majnert
• Re: PSA: publishing new WD of Gamepad on April 14 Florian Bösch
• HTML Import for Web Designers Rahly
• PSA: publishing new WD of Gamepad on April 14 Arthur Barstow
• [Bug 28449] New: [Shadow]: Allow certain psuedo-classes in content selectors bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 8 April 2015

• Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM Dimitri Glazkov
• [Bug 28446] New: [Shadow]: Consider removal of multiple shadow roots bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28445] New: [Shadow]: The default value of open/closed flag bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28444] New: [Shadow]: Make event retargeting optional bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28443] New: [Shadow]: Specify distribution in terms of event loop bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28442] New: [Shadow]: Isolated Shadow trees bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28441] New: [Shadow]: Declarative Shadow DOM bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28440] New: [Shadow]: Layout Containment and Shadow Trees bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 7 April 2015

• [public-webapps] <none> Island Girl Hair Extensions

Wednesday, 8 April 2015

• Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM Hayato Ito
• Mozilla and the Shadow DOM Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 7 April 2015

• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Wayne Carr
• PSA: publishing new WD of Input Method Editor (IME) API on April 9 Arthur Barstow
• RE: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Nilsson, Claes1
• RE: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Nilsson, Claes1
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Frederick Hirsch
• Reminder: [admin] Registration for April 24 2015 Web Components f2f meeting; deadline April 10 Arthur Barstow
• [Bug 22414] 304 handling bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 6 April 2015

• PSA: publishing new WD of Quota Management API on April 9 Arthur Barstow

Sunday, 5 April 2015

• Re: user-agent header control Anne van Kesteren
• Re: user-agent header control Bjoern Hoehrmann
• user-agent header control Anne van Kesteren

Thursday, 2 April 2015

• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Wayne Carr
• [Bug 22540] Fire event when database connection is closed without explicit close() call bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Jeffrey Yasskin
• Re: [websockets] Test results available Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Thread-Safe DOM // was Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest Marc Fawzi
• Re: [websockets] Test results available Simon Pieters
• Re: [websockets] Test results available Simon Pieters
• Re: [websockets] Test results available Simon Pieters
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Florian Bösch
• Re: [websockets] Test results available Simon Pieters
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Anders Rundgren
• Re: [websockets] Test results available Simon Pieters
• Re: [websockets] Test results available Simon Pieters
• RE: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Nilsson, Claes1

Wednesday, 1 April 2015

• Minutes IndieUI Teleconference 1 April 2015 Michael Cooper
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Jonas Sicking
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Jeffrey Yasskin
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Florian Bösch
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Anders Rundgren
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Jonas Sicking
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Anne van Kesteren
• RE: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Domenic Denicola
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Boris Zbarsky
• RE: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Domenic Denicola
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Florian Bösch
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Jonas Sicking
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Florian Bösch
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Jonas Sicking
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Anders Rundgren
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Anne van Kesteren
• RE: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Domenic Denicola
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Anne van Kesteren
• RE: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Domenic Denicola
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Anne van Kesteren
• RE: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Nilsson, Claes1
• RE: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Nilsson, Claes1
• [Bug 24475] StorageQuota.supportedTypes should return a frozen Array bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Florian Bösch
• Re: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Anne van Kesteren
• [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification Nilsson, Claes1
• Re: Pointer lock spec Florian Bösch

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 June 2015 23:59:38 UTC