W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2015

RE: [Imports] Considering imperative HTML imports?

From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 20:01:01 +0000
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
CC: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BLUPR03MB3891DA8EBDFAB1C89DDB12AF8E40@BLUPR03MB389.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Hmmm. Well, regardless, this is tracked here: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25319, so I'll add a few comments to that bug.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:annevk@annevk.nl] 
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:54 PM
To: Travis Leithead
Cc: Boris Zbarsky; public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Imports] Considering imperative HTML imports?

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Oh! XHR slipped my mind. It would be identical :) (Though perhaps a 
> tiny-bit easier to use.)

Would it? Imports load subresources and execute scripts within the global of the importer. (Forgot what happens to stylesheets.)


Received on Thursday, 16 April 2015 20:01:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:27:31 UTC