- From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 20:01:01 +0000
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hmmm. Well, regardless, this is tracked here: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25319, so I'll add a few comments to that bug. -----Original Message----- From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:annevk@annevk.nl] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:54 PM To: Travis Leithead Cc: Boris Zbarsky; public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Re: [Imports] Considering imperative HTML imports? On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com> wrote: > Oh! XHR slipped my mind. It would be identical :) (Though perhaps a > tiny-bit easier to use.) Would it? Imports load subresources and execute scripts within the global of the importer. (Forgot what happens to stylesheets.) -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 16 April 2015 20:01:29 UTC