RE: Custom Elements: is="" from Léonie Watson on 2015-06-12 (public-webapps@w3.org from April to June 2015)

From: Léonie Watson <lwatson@paciellogroup.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:41:23 +0100
To: "'Justin Fagnani'" <justinfagnani@google.com>, "'Joshua Peek'" <josh@joshpeek.com>
Cc: "'WebApps WG'" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <070001d0a537$00a7b6c0$01f72440$@paciellogroup.com>

Is there a succinct explanation of why the is= syntax is disliked? The info on the WHATWG wiki explains where is= breaks, but doesn’t offer much on the syntax issue [1].

 

Léonie.

[1] https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Custom_Elements#Subclassing_existing_elements 

 

-- 

Léonie Watson - Senior accessibility engineer

@LeonieWatson @PacielloGroup PacielloGroup.com

Received on Friday, 12 June 2015 17:41:47 UTC