On Jun 9, 2015 8:45 AM, "Dimitri Glazkov" <dglazkov@google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: >> >> >> > - v1 sets the stage for people to develop habits and expectations about how >> > custom elements work. New features tend to be slowly adopted, by both >> > browser vendors and (partly as a consequence) developers, so even if we do >> > come up with something for v2, it will be even longer before it becomes >> > mainstream (and as I mentioned earlier we will still be stuck with code >> > written to v1 for much longer again). >> >> I don't see how it will be longer. is="" is not getting acceptance >> as-is. So all this would result in is not getting custom elements >> across browsers until v2 is done. > > > I sort of assumes that the reason for this discussion is to get everyone on the same page regarding type extension and hope to arrive at better acceptance. > > Arguing that something isn't getting acceptance when the purpose of discussion is attempting to gain the said acceptance seems a bit circular. > > Other than that, please do continue this conversation! :) I'll also note that a large fraction of Polymer elements and Polymer using pages, thus a large fraction of existing custom elements and use, uses is=, via <template is="dom-repeat / dom-if / dom-bind"> and <style is="custom-style">. So as far as current custom elements are concerned, is= is accepted. > > :DG<
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2015 15:57:08 UTC