W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2015

RE: Custom Elements: is=""

From: Léonie Watson <lwatson@paciellogroup.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 16:46:08 +0200
To: "'Anne van Kesteren'" <annevk@annevk.nl>, "'WebApps WG'" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <036801d0880b$661f27c0$325d7740$@paciellogroup.com>
> From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:annevk@annevk.nl]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 15:25
> Open issues are kept track of here:
> 
>   https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Custom_Elements
> 
> I think we reached rough consensus at the Extensible Web Summit that is=""
> does not do much, even for accessibility. Accessibility is something we need
> to tackle low-level by figuring out how builtin elements work:
> 
>   https://github.com/domenic/html-as-custom-elements

If we use ARIA to feed accessibility information into the examples in this project, we should end up with some useful blueprints.
 
> And we need to tackle it high-level by making it easier to style builtin
> elements:
> 
>   http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-forms/
> 
> And if the parser functionality provided by is="" is of great value, we should
> consider parsing elements with a hyphen in them differently.
> Similar to how <script> and <template> are allowed pretty much
> everywhere.
> 
> Therefore, I propose that we move subclassing of builtin elements to v2,
> remove is="" from the specification, and potentially open an issue on HTML
> parser changes.

My understanding is that sub-classing would give us the accessibility inheritance we were hoping is= would provide. Apologies if I've missed it somewhere obvious, but is there any information/detail about the proposed sub-classing feature available anywhere?

Léonie.


-- 
Léonie Watson - Senior accessibility engineer, TPG
@LeonieWatson @PacielloGroup
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2015 14:46:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:27:31 UTC