W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2015

Re: Imperative API for Node Distribution in Shadow DOM (Revisited)

From: Matthew Robb <matthewwrobb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:41:17 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAngBgia4+5wzJuw-wj_BWOgmqXqq5tVPpriM4E0u=Piqx_ZaA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: Justin Fagnani <justinfagnani@google.com>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Erik Bryn <erik@erikbryn.com>, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>
I know this isn't the biggest deal but I think naming the function
distribute is highly suggestive, why not just expose this as
`childListChangedCallback` ?


- Matthew Robb

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Justin Fagnani
> <justinfagnani@google.com> wrote:
> > A separate hidden tree per class sounds very much like multiple
> generations
> > of shadow trees, and we just killed that...
>
> We "killed" it for v1, not indefinitely. As I already said, based on
> my post-meeting conversations it might not have been as contentious as
> I thought. It's mostly the specifics. I haven't quite wrapped my head
> around those specifics, but the way Gecko implemented <shadow> (which
> does not match the specification or Chrome) seemed to be very similar
> to what Apple wanted.
>
>
> --
> https://annevankesteren.nl/
>
>
Received on Monday, 27 April 2015 13:42:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:27:31 UTC