W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2015

[selectors-api] How to mark TR version as obsolete/superseded? [Was: Re: Obsolete Document]

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 08:21:10 -0400
Message-ID: <553F7B36.9080200@gmail.com>
To: Gulfaraz Yasin <gulfarazyasin@gmail.com>, "Xiaoqian (Cindy) Wu" <xiaoqian@w3.org>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 3/26/15 8:30 AM, Gulfaraz Yasin wrote:
> Hi
>
> It has come to my notice that the following document
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/selectors-api/#resolving-namespaces
>
> is obsolete.

Hi Gulfaraz,

Thanks for your e-mail and sorry for the slow reply.


> I was directed to it's page from one of StackOverflow's answers and 
> after following up a bit I've been informed that the above document is 
> obsolete.


Yes, this is true.


> It would be very helpful if there was a notice on the page that 
> informed it's visitors of the same.


Yes, I agree. I think the "principle of least surprise" implies the 
document at w3.org/TR/selectors-api/ should be gutted of all technical 
content and a reference to the DOM spec [DOM] (which supersede Selectors 
API) should be added (as well as a clear statement work on selectors-api 
has stopped and its features/APIs are superseded by [DOM]). However, I 
suspect the consortium's publication processes might not permit that.

Xiaoqian, Yves - can we do as I suggest above? If not, what is your 
recommendation re making sure people understand work on selectors-api 
has stopped and it is superseded by [DOM]?

-Thanks, AB

[DOM] http://www.w3.org/TR/dom/
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2015 12:21:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:27:31 UTC