Re: Custom Elements: is="" from Bruce Lawson on 2015-06-15 (public-webapps@w3.org from April to June 2015)

From: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 09:45:32 +0100
To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Cc: lwatson@paciellogroup.com, Tobie Langel <tobie@codespeaks.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAFGRefJ6oL0GA8temf9F6dwB23h4=uSBO81AjiGJTYQg+LH3Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 14 June 2015 at 01:41, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote:
> it makes more sense to work on stylability of standard elements.

I'd like to keep the is="" construct (or better name) in the knowledge
that it's a stopgap for v1, and put our energies we're currently
expending debating this into styling standard elements - which is
currently being considered http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-forms/

b

Received on Monday, 15 June 2015 08:46:04 UTC