- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:56:08 +0200
- To: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
- Cc: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, Léonie Watson <lwatson@paciellogroup.com>, Tobie Langel <tobie@codespeaks.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com> wrote: > On 14 June 2015 at 01:41, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: >> it makes more sense to work on stylability of standard elements. > > I'd like to keep the is="" construct (or better name) in the knowledge > that it's a stopgap for v1, and put our energies we're currently > expending debating this into styling standard elements - which is > currently being considered http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-forms/ Why should we standardize a stopgap? -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 15 June 2015 08:56:37 UTC