- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 08:05:55 -0400
- To: chaals@yandex-team.ru
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 5/12/15 7:57 AM, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote: > I don't think we need a CfC to publish a WD, right? We should just > publish it, and then open a CfC on the plan to move to 2nd edition > with these changes incorporated, and asking if there are other changes > we should include before we move ahead. Yes, our SOP is not to do a CfC for a `plain` WD publication but I understood a `wide review WD` as a signal the spec is feature complete and the next step is CR+. Thus in this case, it seems like a single CfC to capture that, plus the other stuff I mentioned should be sufficient. -AB
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2015 12:06:23 UTC