- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 17:06:28 +0200
- To: Justin Fagnani <justinfagnani@google.com>
- Cc: Alice Boxhall <aboxhall@google.com>, Léonie Watson <lwatson@paciellogroup.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Justin Fagnani <justinfagnani@google.com> wrote: > And I'm still concerned that removing is= would severely harm the cases > where you need access to special parsing behavior like <template> and > <style>. With synchronous constructors you could imagine setting the parsing policy in the constructor (as `this[Element.parsingPolicy] = x` or some such). I wouldn't want to do that for v1, but it opens up that possibility of making the HTML parser hackable. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2015 15:06:53 UTC