Re: [admin] Moving Custom Elements bugs to Github [Was: Re: Custom Elements bugs will be also migrated]

Hi Hayato, 

public-webapps has been removed from the default CC list of ‘Component Model’. Please let us know when you finish migrating and we will recover this component ASAP.

Thanks.

—
xiaoqian

> On 29 Jun, 2015, at 10:42 pm, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Yves, Xiaoqian, Mike - would one of you please do as Hayato requests below (and then notify him so he can move the Custom Elements bugs to Github)?
> 
> -Thanks, ArtB
> 
> On 6/25/15 2:49 AM, Hayato Ito wrote:
>> I am thinking about migrating Custom Element bugs[1] to Web Components GitHub Issues [2], as I did it for Shadow DOM a few weeks ago, for the consistency.
>> 
>> Could someone turn off the automatic email to public-webapps for Custom Elements Bugs in the bugzilla so that we won't receive the mass flood of bugspam by marking the all bugs MOVED? I'm assuming the automatic email is on for public-webapps@.
>> 
>> If you have any concerns about migrating, let me know that.
>> 
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/showdependencytree.cgi?id=14968&hide_resolved=1
>> [2] https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues
>> 
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:35 AM Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com <mailto:hayato@google.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>    I totally agree. I'm really sorry for spamming. I forgot that
>>    closing a bug would trigger sending a mail to public-webapps@. My bad.
>> 
>>    I thought that a closing bug would notify only people who opted-in
>>    to add themselves to a list of cc in each bug. That might be a
>>    good opportunity for them to keep tracking of the bug status by
>>    subscribing a migrated bug on GitHub Issues.
>> 
>>    On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:49 AM Tab Atkins Jr.
>>    <jackalmage@gmail.com <mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>        Note for the future (to you and editors of other specs in
>>        WebApps):
>> 
>>        Before doing this kind of mass bug editting, please turn off the
>>        automatic email to public-webapps.  If you can't do that yourself,
>>        Mike Smith can (at least, he's done it in the past).  That
>>        prevents
>>        the mass flood of bugspam from clogging up people's inboxes. ^_^
>> 
>>        ~TJ
>> 
>>        On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com
>>        <mailto:hayato@google.com>> wrote:
>>        > PSA: I've finished the migration. All open bugs are now
>>        marked as "MOVED"
>>        > with a link to the corresponding GitHub issue.
>>        >
>>        > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 5:58 PM Hayato Ito
>>        <hayato@google.com <mailto:hayato@google.com>> wrote:
>>        >>
>>        >> Regarding with the Shadow DOM spec, more and more workflows
>>        are happening
>>        >> [1] on GitHub w3c/webcomponents repository recently.
>>        >> Therefore, I am thinking about migrating the bugs of the
>>        Shadow DOM spec,
>>        >> from the bugzilla [2], to the GitHub issues [3], as some of
>>        other specs are
>>        >> already doing so.
>>        >>
>>        >> As an experiment, I've just migrated the existing open bugs
>>        on the
>>        >> bugzilla to the GitHub issues, by a tiny script I've
>>        written using GitHub
>>        >> APIs.
>>        >>
>>        >> Unless there is an objection to the migration, I am going
>>        to close the
>>        >> existing open Shadow DOM spec bugs on the bugzilla, with a
>>        link to the
>>        >> corresponding bug on the GitHub issues.
>>        >>
>>        >> Please let me know if you have a concern.
>>        >>
>>        >> [1] https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/commits/gh-pages
>>        >> [2]
>>        https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/showdependencytree.cgi?id=14978
>>        >> [3] https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues
>>        >>
>>        >
>> 
> 

Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2015 14:21:32 UTC