W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2015

Re: Exposing structured clone as an API?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:27:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CADnb78ixit4XOTVVMSjH4iPGkGYSiHMp1wSf9x_2QmiCbOY3wg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joshua Bell <jsbell@google.com>
Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Ted Mielczarek <ted@mozilla.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Katelyn Gadd <kg@luminance.org>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Joshua Bell <jsbell@google.com> wrote:
> If we're not dragging in the notion of extensibility, is there complication?

I would be fine with adding an API without extensibility. I was just
afraid we might step on TC39's toes, but maybe since they're not
helping out with structured clones that's okay?

Received on Friday, 24 April 2015 22:27:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:27:31 UTC