Re: [Imports] Considering imperative HTML imports?

• From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
• Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:29:55 -0400
• To: public-webapps@w3.org
• Message-ID: <552FFFA3.6000309@mit.edu>

On 4/16/15 12:37 AM, Travis Leithead wrote:
> Was an imperative form of HTML imports already considered? E.g., the
> following springs to mind:
>
>    Promise<Document> importDocument(DOMString url);

How is this different from a promise-ified version of XHR, exactly? 
(Not that there's anything wrong with that; just trying to understand 
the proposal.)

-Boris

Received on Thursday, 16 April 2015 18:30:24 UTC