RE: [W3C TCP and UDP Socket API]: Status and home for this specification from Domenic Denicola on 2015-04-01 (public-webapps@w3.org from April to June 2015)

From: Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:27:37 +0000
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
CC: "Nilsson, Claes1" <Claes1.Nilsson@sonymobile.com>, "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Device APIs Working Group" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "slightlyoff@chromium.org" <slightlyoff@chromium.org>, "yasskin@gmail.com" <yasskin@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CY1PR0501MB136951AE80DF8ABDE5859ED6DFF30@CY1PR0501MB1369.namprd05.prod.outlook.>

I think it's OK for different browsers to experiment with different non-interoperable conditions under which they fulfill or reject the permissions promise. That's already true for most permissions grants today.

Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2015 14:28:07 UTC