[Work in Progress on "Web Notification" Working Group
[Bug 10056] New: IDBEvent should inherit from DOM Level 3 Event
OMTP BONDI 1.11 errata release
Fwd: [whatwg] what happened to sendAsBinary?
[widgets] Draft agenda for 1 July 2010 voice conf
any plans to move from cvs to git?
BlobWriter simplification/split
[Bug 10052] New: Specify setVersion details
XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
- Re: XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
- Re: XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
- Re: XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
[File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor
- Re: [File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor
[Bug 10027] New: Remove explicit add/remove functions from IDBIndex
[IndexedDB] IDBEvent and Event
[IndexedDB] Syntax for opening a cursor
Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
ISSUE-117: In Widget P&C Spec, need to clarify in the spec that dir attribute does not apply to attributes that are IRIs, Numeric, Keywords, etc. The dir attribute only affects human readable strings.
[Bug 10007] New: Async callbacks should fire in the same order the async requests are made in IndexedDB.
[IndexedDB] Atomic schema changes
[Bug 10000] New: Allow expressions in addition to keyPaths when creating indexes
[Bug 9989] New: Is the number of replacement characters supposed to be well-defined? If not this should be explicitly noted. If it is then more detail is required.
Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- Re: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- Re: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
Re: [fileapi] urn -> URL
[indexedDB] spec update
[Bug 9975] New: Mozilla async API proposal
[Bug 9973] New: If the entry's name is "sec-websocket-protocol" 0 please don't put normative requirements in parenthesis
[IndexedDB] Callback order
[IndexedDB] Multi-value keys
New mailing list for Web Performance
[IndexedDB] Computed indexes
Widget Updates Standard
State of Media Type Sniffing
[IndexedDB] Posting lists/inverted indexes
[widgets] Draft minutes from 17 June 2010 voice conf
Re: [whatwg] Do we really need a <device> element?
where did input type=file end up?
File* specs: Please use public-webapps (exclusively) for all technical discussions
[widgets] Draft agenda for 17 June 2010 voice conf
Transferring File* to WebApps — Proposed path forward
- RE: Transferring File* to WebApps - Proposed path forward
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps — Proposed path forward
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps — Proposed path forward
Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- RE: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
Wanted: Editor for Web IDL spec
CfC: Candidate Recommendation of XMLHttpRequest; deadline June 30
[WebIDL] NoInterfaceObject and access to constants
ACTION-438 Question about possibility of cross-site data sharing in Web Storage
- Re: ACTION-438 Question about possibility of cross-site data sharing in Web Storage
- Re: ACTION-438 Question about possibility of cross-site data sharing in Web Storage
Re: ISSUE-90: Exposing more (~infinite) response headers [CORS]
Re: [xhr] authorization (was: Re: call for reviewers: XMLHttpRequest Last Call)
[Bug 9921] New: IDBIndexedDatabase should be called IDBFactory
RE: Updates to File API and blob url schemes
[Bug 9903] New: Need to define specification and use of collations for string sorting
- [Bug 9903] Need to define specification and use of collations for string sorting
- [Bug 9903] Need to define specification and use of collations for string sorting
Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- RE: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- RE: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- RE: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- RE: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- RE: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- RE: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
IndexedDB - renaming
[IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async API changes)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async API changes)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async API changes)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async API changes)
Regrets for today
[IndexDB] Collation Algorithm?
IETF BoF @IETF-78 Maastricht: HASMAT - HTTP Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport
RfC: LCWD of API and Ontology for Media Resource 1.0; deadline 11 July 2010
[Bug 9888] New: Constants are not accessible when they're needed for most IndexedDB interfaces.
OFF TOPIC: SVG Progress Contest
JS crypto pointer
Last Call Working Drafts transition announcement of the API and Ontology for Media Resource 1.0
[WebTiming] Updates
[Bug 9882] New: Behavior when attempting to write data to an objectStore opened as read only unspecified
[IndexedDB] Status
[XHR2] Event Handler Attributes - onredirect
[widgets] Draft minutes 3 June 2010 voice conf
[Bug 9832] New: keyPath is underspecified
[widgets] Draft agenda for 3 June 2010 voice conf
HTML5 File
Automatic translation/validation of WebIDL documents
Reminder: Seeking comments on LCWDs of Server-events, Web Storage, Web Workers; deadline 30-June-2010
JSON-LD - Universal Linked Data markup for Web Services
[Bug 9823] New: Add "maxExecutionContexts" property with number of hardware execution contexts
[widgets PC] i18n comment 21: Language tag case
[widgets PC] i18n comment 23: i18n string
[widgets PC] i18n comment 22: Default content
[widgets PC] i18n comment 21: i18n string
comments
[widgets] Draft minutes from 27 May 2010 voice conf
[widgets] Draft agenda for 27 May 2010 voice conf
Reminder: RfC: 11-May-2010 LCWD of Digital Signatures for Widgets spec; deadline 1 June 2010
Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
Can IndexedDB depend on JavaScript? (WAS: [Bug 9793] New: Allow dates and floating point numbers in keys)
- Re: Can IndexedDB depend on JavaScript? (WAS: [Bug 9793] New: Allow dates and floating point numbers in keys)
- Re: Can IndexedDB depend on JavaScript? (WAS: [Bug 9793] New: Allow dates and floating point numbers in keys)
[Bug 9796] New: IndexedDB's async interface should be available within workers
[Bug 9793] New: Allow dates and floating point numbers in keys
[Bug 9791] New: IDBDatabase should (possibly) be renamed to IDBConnection
[Bug 9790] New: Request is not a good suffix for all the async interfaces in IndexedDB
- [Bug 9790] Request is not a good suffix for all the async interfaces in IndexedDB
- [Bug 9790] Request is not a good suffix for all the async interfaces in IndexedDB
[Bug 9789] New: We should use the IDB prefix on all IDB interfaces
[Bug 9786] New: WebIDL bugs in IndexedDB spec
IndexedDB WebIDL bugs
[widgets PC] i18n comment 15 : Persian dir examples
[widgets PC] i18n comment 20 : Misuse of xml:lang for localization flag
[widgets PC] i18n comment 19 : Corrupted Chinese text
[widgets PC] i18n comment 18 : Empty dir value
[widgets PC] i18n comment 17 : What ITS did
[widgets] Draft minutes from 20 May 2010 voice conf
PFWG comments on View Mode Media Feature
ENISA Smartphone security study
[widgets] Draft agenda for 20 May 2010 voice conf
[Bug 9769] New: IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put should be split into 3 methods
- [IndexedDB] Re: [Bug 9769] New: IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put should be split into 3 methods
- [Bug 9769] IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put should be split into 3 methods
- [Bug 9769] IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put should be split into 3 methods
[Bug 9768] New: Indexes should hang off of objectStores rather than the IDBDatabaseRequest/Sync objects
[IndexedDB] WebSimpleDB in the bug tracker
[IndexedDB] KeyPaths and missing properties.
- Re: [IndexedDB] KeyPaths and missing properties.
[Bug 9766] New: We should expose the subprotocol for the case of the client not specifying one but the server specifying one
[widgets] rename View Mode Media Feature spec
[IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
RfC: Three Last Call WDs by the XML Security WG; deadline 11-May-2010
[Bug 9745] New: We should require nextprotoneg support when doing the TLS handshake for WebSocket.
Widgets support
[Bug 9739] New: Editorial review from timeless on March 24, 2010
[Bug 9738] New: Improve IDL documentation
widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
Last Word-ism (was: Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest)
Updates to File API
CORS Header Filtering?
[IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
JS crypto?
[widgets] No call on 13 May 2010; next call is 20 May
Re: [whatwg] New File attributes creationDate, modificationDate and size
[IndexedDB] Asynchronous inline key generation for autoIncrement'ing objectStores
RfC: 11-May-2010 LCWD of Digital Signatures for Widgets spec; deadline 1 June 2010
Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Client-side cross origin
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
CORS Questions
[Bug 9698] New: Rename all instances of noOverwrite to overwite
Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback
[xhr2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
[IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
[cors] Simplify CORS Headers (ISSUE-89)
- Re: [cors] Simplify CORS Headers (ISSUE-89)
- RE: [cors] Simplify CORS Headers (ISSUE-89)
- Re: [cors] Simplify CORS Headers (ISSUE-89)
[IndexedDB] Changes to IDBRequest and specification of the success and error events
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changes to IDBRequest and specification of the success and error events
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changes to IDBRequest and specification of the success and error events
[widgets] Draft minutes from 6 May 2010 voice conf
Minor DigSig feedback
Pre-LC Review Requested: System Information API
- Re: Pre-LC Review Requested: System Information API
- Re: Pre-LC Review Requested: System Information API
- Re: Pre-LC Review Requested: System Information API
DigSig feedback
Seeking implementation data for XBL2
Re: Status of Selectors API Level 1 Candidate
[IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
[widgets] WARP default policy
- Re: [widgets] WARP default policy
- Re: [widgets] WARP default policy
- Re: [widgets] WARP default policy
[Bug 9653] New: How to handle nullable violations is not specified.
[widgets] Draft agenda for 6 May 2010 voice conf
Re: [widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources
[widgets] Moving to DVCS platform Re: [admin] DVCS platform at W3C
- Re: [widgets] Moving to DVCS platform Re: [admin] DVCS platform at W3C
- Re: [widgets] Moving to DVCS platform Re: [admin] DVCS platform at W3C
Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations
Quick review of RDFa DOM API?
Re: [widgets] Span example
Review of update to Widget Signature
[admin] DVCS platform at W3C
StorageEvent.url (WAS: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob)
can we extend some html file as resource in a widget?
[widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
FileWriter updated
[WebTiming] Exporting flattened DOMTiming data
- Re: [WebTiming] Exporting flattened DOMTiming data
- Re: [WebTiming] Exporting flattened DOMTiming data
- Re: [WebTiming] Exporting flattened DOMTiming data
XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
JTC1-SC 34/W3C [ISO ZIP] Work Item proposal for ISO ZIP
Client side JavaScript i18n API
- Re: Client side JavaScript i18n API
Re: [IndexedDB] Explaining Asynchronous event-style interface
[IndexedDB/WebIDL] Dates + Sorting (WAS: Detailed comments for the current draft)
[WebNotifications] omnibus feedback reply, new draft
- Re: [WebNotifications] omnibus feedback reply, new draft
- Re: [WebNotifications] omnibus feedback reply, new draft
[widgets] Call for Implementation: WARP spec
[widgets] Draft agenda for 22 April 2010 voice conf
FileReader question about ProgressEvent
- Re: FileReader question about ProgressEvent
- Re: FileReader question about ProgressEvent
- Re: FileReader question about ProgressEvent
[Bug 9563] New: The events passed to the event handlers are underspecified
[Bug 9562] New: Opening a database with a different description is underspecified
[Bug 9561] New: IDBRequest should inherit from EventTarget
Request for Comments: LCWD of View Mode Media Feature; deadline 18 May 2010
- Re: Request for Comments: LCWD of View Mode Media Feature; deadline 18 May 2010
- Reminder: Request for Comments: LCWD of View Mode Media Feature; deadline 18 May 2010
[Bug 9557] New: Could we get Mouse Capture via Javascript?
Re: [IndexedDB] Dynamic Transactions (WAS: Lots of small nits and clarifying questions)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Dynamic Transactions (WAS: Lots of small nits and clarifying questions)
[IndexedDB] Bug/enhancement requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] Bug/enhancement requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] Bug/enhancement requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] Bug/enhancement requests
Re: [IndexedDB] Dynamic Transactions (WAS: Lots of small nits and clarifying questions)
UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
Request for Comments: LCWD of Digital Signatures for Widgets; deadline 6 May 2010
- Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Digital Signatures for Widgets; deadline 6 May 2010
can we develop a w3c widget engine for the webkit?
[widgets] Draft minutes for 15 April 2010 voice conf
Re: [Uri-review] Review request: widget URI scheme
Re: [widgets] URI spec: Note for authors
Re: Websockets API / CloseEvent and readyState
[widgets] Draft agenda for 15 April 2010 voice conf
FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
- Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
- Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
- Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
[IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
Server Sent Events vs Web Sockets?
VMMF updated
Re: VMMF - new version
Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec
Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17
DOM 2 Views
Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec
Re: [WARP] comment on subdomains
Not making partial result available during FileReader.readAsText()?
- Re: Not making partial result available during FileReader.readAsText()?
Ordering of error/load and loadend events for FileReader
Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
Updated Digital Signatures for Widgets Editors Draft
[widgets] Draft minutes from 8 April 2010 voice conf
[widgets] Draft agenda for 8 April 2010 voice conf
Widget Signature modification proposal (revised)
[UMP] Request for Last Call
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]