W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: [IndexedDB] Bug/enhancement requests

From: Nikunj Mehta <nikunj@o-micron.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 10:18:23 -0700
Cc: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2B4C6E32-5834-4803-9A27-913B3839103D@o-micron.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Art,

Let's use Bugzilla for all the spec bugs and enhancement requests on IndexedDB. Once we decide to track "issues" and find independent resolution, we could use TrackBot.

Nikunj
On Apr 21, 2010, at 10:11 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:

> Nikunj,
> 
> On Apr 20, 2010, at 2:29 AM, ext Nikunj Mehta wrote:
> 
>> In order to have a sane process around processing feedback and keeping track of progress, may I request you to please use the W3 issue tracking system [1], when possible?
>> 
>> This will greatly assist all of us in our efforts to improve IndexedDB and track the editor's processing of your feedback.
>> 
>> I am not sure what the W3C process is for processing feedback, but I will endeavor to collect everything there and process it accordingly.
> 
> WebApps uses both Trackbot [Trackbot] and Bugzilla [W3C-Bugzilla]. The choice is somewhat arbitrary but generally, Trackbot is used for all of the specs that did not move to WebApps from the HTML WG.
> 
> Anyhow, WebApps' Trackbot includes two related Products: IndexedDB and WebSimpleDB.
> 
> If you are going to use [1] instead of Trackbot, I will delete these two "products" (FYI, no issues were added to either of these products). OK?
> 
> -Art Barstow
> 
> [Trackbot] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/
> [W3C-Bugzilla] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/query.cgi
> 
> 
>> Regards,
>> Nikunj
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=WebAppsWG&component=WebSimpleDB
> 
Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:45:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:38 GMT