- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:51:14 -0700
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>, Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>, ext Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Tyler Close > <tyler.close@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Maciej Stachowiak >>> <mjs@apple.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Tyler Close wrote: >>>> >>>>> Uniform-Headers = "Uniform-Headers" ":" ( "*" | #field-name ) >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>>>> Are Apple and/or Firefox interested in implementing the above? >>>>> Does >>>>> mnot or other HTTP WG members consider the above a satisfactory >>>>> solution to ISSUE-90? >>>> >>>> I'm interested in implementing a feature along these lines if it >>>> goes into >>>> CORS. If it's UMP-only, then no, and I would object that it >>>> violates the >>>> subset relation. >>>> >>>> I am also not sure the * value is a good idea. It is tempting in >>>> its >>>> convenience but seems likely to cause unintended consequences. >>> >>> I agree with everything Maciej said. >>> >>> This time. >> >> Thanks for the quick response time. >> >> If this is a good feature, shouldn't the pressure be on CORS to adopt >> it, rather than for UMP to drop it? Otherwise, it might seem politics >> are overriding technical virtue. > > I didn't mean to exert any pressure on UMP to drop it. Sorry if you > read otherwise into what I said. Me neither. I don't intend to pressure anyone in particular. I'd like to come to consensus on a solution and ideally add it to both specs. - Maciej
Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 22:51:47 UTC