W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: Widget Signature Issue and Proposed Resolution

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 15:20:41 +0200
Message-ID: <t2qb21a10671004060620o8a4e0deer895a4085d1a87be3@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote:
> On 31 Mar 2010, at 15:07, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
>
> Note that this specifically means that a ds:Reference to the ds:Object
> element and the ds:Reference to config.xml will each require a ds:Transform
> element to specify canonicalization method.
>
> That's not true for config.xml -- that file is not referenced as with a
> same-document URI reference; therefore, it is treated as an octet-stream.

Agree with Thomas. Please treat config.xml (and all other content
files) as octet-streams. Having to do canonicalization on resources
within the widget will lead to more complexity.

Kind regards,
Marcos

-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:21:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:38 GMT