W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes

From: Shawn Wilsher <sdwilsh@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 09:48:05 -0700
Message-ID: <4BF567C5.1020102@mozilla.com>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
CC: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 5/20/2010 9:03 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> For what it's worth, one of the ideas behind object stores, rather
> than rows+column stores, is to reduce the need for joins. I.e. in our
> candy store example you could just as well store objects like:
>
> { id: 1, name: "Adam", sales: [{candyId: 1, date: "2010-01-02"}, ...]}
Well, if people care about the size of data on disk, they will likely 
want to normalize their object stores.  We had talked about doing joins 
before in indexedDB, but I believe we decided to punt on the issue for now.

Cheers,

Shawn



Received on Thursday, 20 May 2010 16:46:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:38 GMT