W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: Thoughts on WebNotification

From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:47:30 +0200
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org, John Gregg <johnnyg@google.com>
Message-Id: <B2529A63-9D95-4830-8F82-09957A021A2C@berjon.com>
To: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
On Jun 24, 2010, at 20:38 , Doug Turner wrote:
> 3) Move Web notifications to a version 2 of the specification.  For the most basic use cases, this API isn't required and a web developer could use the more base API to simulate this.  Furthermore, as I mentioned above, many system-level notification services know nothing about rendering html.

I agree that it's better to move optional features to a v2 (or additional module). It's not a huge deal but it does help make test suites simpler and keeps complexity out of the core document.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Friday, 25 June 2010 11:47:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:39 GMT