W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2010

[Bug 9789] New: We should use the IDB prefix on all IDB interfaces

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 16:22:45 +0000
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-9789-2927@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9789

           Summary: We should use the IDB prefix on all IDB interfaces
           Product: WebAppsWG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Indexed Database API
        AssignedTo: nikunj.mehta@oracle.com
        ReportedBy: jorlow@chromium.org
         QAContact: member-webapi-cvs@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org


Andrei Popescu proposed a couple naming changes to the interfaces within
IndedexDB deep within the "[IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes" thread
[1].

One of them suggested we consistently use the IDB prefix on all IndexedDB
interfaces.  Jeremy, Shawn, and Jonas have concurred.

> - I know we need to keep the "IDB" prefix in order to avoid collisions
> with other APIs. I would therefore think we should keep the IDB prefix
> and make sure all the interfaces start with it (right now they don't).

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010AprJun/0801.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 21 May 2010 16:22:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:38 GMT