RE: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 from Pablo Castro on 2010-06-10 (public-webapps@w3.org from April to June 2010)

From: Pablo Castro <Pablo.Castro@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:15:17 +0000
To: Kris Zyp <kris@sitepen.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F753B2C401114141B426DB383C8885E058E18C42@TK5EX14MBXC126.redmond.corp.microsoft.>

>> From: public-webapps-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kris Zyp
>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 9:49 AM
>> Subject: Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2

>> I see that in the trunk version of the spec [1] that delete() was
>> changed to remove(). I thought we had established that there is no
>> reason to make this change. Is anyone seriously expecting to have an
>> implementation prior to or without ES5's contextually unreserved
>> keywords? I would greatly prefer delete(), as it is much more
>> consistent with standard DB and REST terminology.

My concern is that it seems like taking an unnecessary risk. I understand the familiarity aspect (and I like delete() better as well), but to me that's not a strong enough reason to use it and potentially cause trouble in some browser.

-pablo

Received on Thursday, 10 June 2010 22:16:04 UTC