W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:39:25 -0700
Cc: "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-id: <6724F704-0C88-4504-A978-F2B0C5410EAE@apple.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>

On Apr 21, 2010, at 11:11 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:36:50 +0900, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>  
> wrote:
>> Unfortunately "ambient" doesn't have any good antonyms:
>>
>> http://www.synonym.com/antonym/ambient/
>
> Simon suggested XMLHttpRequestNoContext in #whatwg. Seems relatively  
> clear and works nicely with indexes and autocomplete.
>

Other ideas (also suffix variants instead of prefix variants):

- GuestXMLHttpRequest
Suggested by Mark originally. We now envision more use cases than  
guest code, however, "guest" is also the traditional name for an  
unprivileged account.

- UnprivilegedXMLHttpRequest (or abbreviate to NoPrivs)
- NoAuthorityXMLHttpRequest (or abbreviate to NoAuth, though that may  
seem like "no authentication")
- NoCredentialsXMLHttpRequest (or abbreviate to NoCred)

Can anyone else think of ideas? I tried to mentally fill in sentences  
like, "I don't want to do this as root, I want to use a/an _______  
account" or "I don't want to be logged into site X, I want to be  
________ when I visit it."

Regards,
Maciej
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 06:40:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:38 GMT