On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:12:33 +0200, Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com> wrote: > I've uploaded a new draft of the Uniform Messaging Policy to: > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/UMP/ > > This version adopts the same redirect handling specified by CORS. With > this change I believe there are no outstanding issues with UMP. > > The latest version also includes clarifications on the use of HTTP > caching in uniform requests, as well as the prohibition of client > authenticated connections for uniform requests. Both of these changes > reflect clarifications discussed on the list. > > I believe the current editor's draft of UMP reflects all feedback > received on the FPWD and is ready to proceed to Last Call. Since this is just a superset of CORS I wonder why we need it. Are there any vendors considering dropping support for CORS in favor of just supporting UMP? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 09:55:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:38 GMT