W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas

From: Dumitru Daniliuc <dumi@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:54:44 -0700
Message-ID: <t2he753f47f1004281454qf324f49fi4f0908e8a6348667@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shawn Wilsher <sdwilsh@mozilla.com>
Cc: Nikunj Mehta <nikunj@o-micron.com>, Michael Nordman <michaeln@google.com>, Mike Clement <mikec@google.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
shawn, did you have a chance to give this some thought? how would mozilla
like to handle cases like the ones jeremy and robin mentioned? how would you
like to manage quotas?

thanks,
dumi


On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Shawn Wilsher <sdwilsh@mozilla.com> wrote:

>  On 4/23/2010 7:39 AM, Nikunj Mehta wrote:
>
>> Could we create an additional optional parameter for an open request with
>> the type of permanence required? Or is it not a good idea?
>>
> I haven't talked to anyone at Mozilla that thinks that having permanent and
> non-permanent-but-possibly-long-lasting data to be a good idea.  There does
> seem to be support for a session-only version of indexedDB.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Shawn
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:55:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:38 GMT