- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:13:26 -0700
- To: Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>, Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>, ext Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Tyler Close wrote: >>> >>>> Uniform-Headers = "Uniform-Headers" ":" ( "*" | #field-name ) >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>> Are Apple and/or Firefox interested in implementing the above? Does >>>> mnot or other HTTP WG members consider the above a satisfactory >>>> solution to ISSUE-90? >>> >>> I'm interested in implementing a feature along these lines if it goes into >>> CORS. If it's UMP-only, then no, and I would object that it violates the >>> subset relation. >>> >>> I am also not sure the * value is a good idea. It is tempting in its >>> convenience but seems likely to cause unintended consequences. >> >> I agree with everything Maciej said. >> >> This time. > > Thanks for the quick response time. > > If this is a good feature, shouldn't the pressure be on CORS to adopt > it, rather than for UMP to drop it? Otherwise, it might seem politics > are overriding technical virtue. I didn't mean to exert any pressure on UMP to drop it. Sorry if you read otherwise into what I said. / Jonas
Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 19:14:19 UTC