W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: [IndexedDB] Bug/enhancement requests

From: Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:43:41 +0900
To: Nikunj Mehta <nikunj@o-micron.com>
Cc: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20100420114340.GA22077@sideshowbarker>
There is not really a single detailed W3C policy that's been
mandated for processing spec feedback. It's basically up to each
individual working group to determine the specific details for
what works best for them.

That said, the HTML WG has a documented Decision Policy document
that outlines the process that group uses -

  http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

WebApps WG editors could consider adapting that policy to their
own processing of feedback. One nice feature of it is that it can
be used for handling of comments for Last Call rounds (not just
for normal Working Drafts or Editors Drafts) -- and, eventually,
for generating the Disposition of Comments reports necessary for
exiting from Last Call.

  --Mike

Nikunj Mehta <nikunj@o-micron.com>, 2010-04-19 23:29 -0700:

> Hi folks,
> 
> I am excited to see all the discussion lately around IndexedDB as well as the attention it is receiving from multiple implementors.
> 
> In order to have a sane process around processing feedback and keeping track of progress, may I request you to please use the W3 issue tracking system [1], when possible?
> 
> This will greatly assist all of us in our efforts to improve IndexedDB and track the editor's processing of your feedback.
> 
> I am not sure what the W3C process is for processing feedback, but I will endeavor to collect everything there and process it accordingly.
> 
> Regards,
> Nikunj
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=WebAppsWG&component=WebSimpleDB
> 

-- 
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike
Received on Tuesday, 20 April 2010 11:43:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:38 GMT