W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: HTML5 File

From: イアンフェッティ <ifette@google.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 09:16:09 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimlo78PTP7lh1U8xYoLMi-0g-a2pQwlh0FBrLcX@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Cc: Cristiano Sumariva <sumariva@gmail.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, public-webapps@w3.org
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote:

> On Jun 3, 2010, at 19:29 , Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) wrote:
> > Actually, I should take that back. Some of the device specs are
> definitely relevant
>
> Right, and some of your colleagues just submitted Powerbox there, which
> seems like a non-negligible chunk of work to me ;-)
>
>
To be clear, Chrome-team is not involved in powerbox, nor is android team to
the best of my knowledge.


> > though I have concerns about the direction they are heading
>
> I regularly hear people having "concerns" about the "direction" in which
> DAP specs are heading. The shame is, they never seem to want to provide any
> details.
>
> > Either way though, it seems strange for the filesystem apis to be split.
>
> As I said, it's historical, and due to no one pushing strong to correct
> that during chartering. Speaking personally, I don't really care much either
> way.
>

I recall pushing strongly to correct that at TPAC in san jose. I don't think
it's purely "historical".


>
> --
> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 4 June 2010 16:16:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:38 GMT