W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 12:08:31 +0200
Message-ID: <4BDAAC1F.9010108@opera.com>
To: ifette@google.com
CC: Gregg Tavares <gman@google.com>, Arve Bersvendsen <arveb@opera.com>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>


On 30/04/10 12:11 AM, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) wrote:
> I remain perplexed by the state of "the spec is feature complete and
> looking for implementations" -> potential implementors saying "the spec
> has X,Y,Z flaws" -> "sorry, the spec is feature complete. We're looking
> for implementations." At this rate, it's not clear to me what
> implementations it's going to get.

The packaging specification has not be shown to have "flaws". In fact, 
it has been shown to be very implementable:

http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/imp-report/

Lacking a feature (streamability) is not a flaw. Its a design decision.

Kind regards,
Marcos

-- 
Marcos Caceres
Opera Software
Received on Friday, 30 April 2010 10:09:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:38 GMT