W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: Client side JavaScript i18n API

From: Nebojša Ćirić <cira@chromium.org>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 10:07:06 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTilv_El028-6ep90GI-FOHCSpIGWWCFjmG_CVVLo@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
Cc: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
In that case we could create, say public-script-i18n-coord list, and
move this discussion there. Doug, could you help us with that?

Nebojsa

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com> wrote:
> Our (I18N activity) experience seems to suggest that a dedicated list is more useful when a project is active. The key thing is to engage in coordination between groups at appropriate times (there exist various means of doing that).
>
> Addison
>
> Addison Phillips
> Globalization Architect (Lab126)
> Chair (W3C I18N, IETF IRI WGs)
>
> Internationalization is not a feature.
> It is an architecture.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cira@google.com [mailto:cira@google.com] On Behalf Of Nebojša
>> Ciric
>> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 5:35 PM
>> To: Doug Schepers
>> Cc: Robin Berjon; Phillips, Addison; public-webapps WG; public-
>> i18n-core@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: Client side JavaScript i18n API
>>
>> Doug,
>>  do you think we should create a new list and move this discussion
>> there? Or should we use one of the existing i18n lists?
>>  If we do move this discussion off the webapps list, we may lose
>> some
>> audience/expertise...
>>
>>  If nobody objects, we (Google) would like to take this discussion
>> to
>> webkit-dev list too, and maybe start prototyping the Locale API in
>> next couple of weeks (both for JSC and V8).
>>
>> Regards,
>>  Nebojsa Ciric
>>
>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi, Robin-
>> >
>> > Robin Berjon wrote (on 4/27/10 12:21 PM):
>> >>
>> >> On Apr 27, 2010, at 18:13 , Phillips, Addison wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> A project to implement this could go quite fast, I think, but
>> would
>> >>> require agreement by the major browser vendors and a place to
>> do
>> >>> the work. We could do this at W3C, but I think ECMA should be
>> >>> involved from early on.
>> >>
>> >> In general a good place for discussion that involves W3C/TC39
>> >> coordination is public-script-coord@w3.org. It doesn't have an
>> >> attached group and therefore cannot publish specifications, but
>> >> that's a sausage-making detail that can be handled orthogonally
>> (we
>> >> just need to find a WG that can justify having this in its
>> charter).
>> >
>> > Actually, public-script-coord is associated with the WebApps WG,
>> and was
>> > formed to coordinate between TC39 and the WebApps WG,
>> specifically on Web
>> > IDL issues, but also on other matters of coordination.
>> >
>> > If we do decide to bring this i18n work to W3C (which I think
>> would be a
>> > good idea, though not by necessity in the WebApps WG), we could
>> reuse
>> > public-script-coord, or we could make a new dedicated list.  I
>> think the
>> > latter makes more sense, since the i18n folks wouldn't have to
>> drink from
>> > the public-script-coord hose.
>> >
>> > Regards-
>> > -Doug Schepers
>> > W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Nebojša Ćirić
>



-- 
Nebojša Ćirić
Received on Friday, 14 May 2010 17:08:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:38 GMT