W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest

From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:45:57 -0700
Message-ID: <s2k5c4444771004191145u7a4dc84cq28503da2177301f2@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
> Hopefully it helps calling out attention to this in a separate thread.
>
> In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010AprJun/0043.html
> Maciej states Apple has no interest in implementing UMP from the UMP
> specification. (I believe this means that a CORS defined subset that roughly
> matches UMP is fine.) They want to retain their CORS support.
>
> For Opera I can say we are planning on supporting on CORS in due course and
> have no plans on implementing UMP from the UMP specification.
>
> It would be nice if the three other major implementors (i.e. Google,
> Mozilla, and Microsoft) also stated their interest for both specifications,
> especially including whether removing their current level of CORS support is
> considered an option.

I've forwarded your question to chromium-dev:

http://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/group/chromium-dev/browse_thread/thread/4ffa158e71ec4613#

Adam
Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 18:47:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:38 GMT