Wednesday, 30 June 2010
- Re: Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- [Work in Progress on "Web Notification" Working Group
- Re: BlobWriter simplification/split
- Re: BlobWriter simplification/split
- Re: BlobWriter simplification/split
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBEvent and Event
- [Bug 10056] New: IDBEvent should inherit from DOM Level 3 Event
- OMTP BONDI 1.11 errata release
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBEvent and Event
- Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations
- Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations
- Re: Fwd: [whatwg] what happened to sendAsBinary?
- Fwd: [whatwg] what happened to sendAsBinary?
- [widgets] Draft agenda for 1 July 2010 voice conf
Sunday, 27 June 2010
Wednesday, 30 June 2010
- Re: Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- BlobWriter simplification/split
Tuesday, 29 June 2010
- Re: XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
- Re: XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
- RE: Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- Re: [IndexedDB] Atomic schema changes
- [Bug 10052] New: Specify setVersion details
- Re: [File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor
- Re: [File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor
- Re: XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
- Re: XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
- Re: [File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor
- Re: XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
- Re: ISSUE-117: In Widget P&C Spec, need to clarify in the spec that dir attribute does not apply to attributes that are IRIs, Numeric, Keywords, etc. The dir attribute only affects human readable strings.
- Re: [widgets PC] i18n comment 21: i18n string
- RE: [widgets PC] i18n comment 21: i18n string
- Re: [widgets PC] i18n comment 21: i18n string
- Re: [widgets PC] i18n comment 22: Default content
- XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
- Re: [IndexedDB] Computed indexes
- Re: [File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor
Monday, 28 June 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Computed indexes
- Re: [File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor
- Re: [File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor
- Re: [File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor
- Re: [File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor
- Re: [File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor
- Re: [File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: [File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: [IndexedDB] Computed indexes
- [File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor
- [Bug 10027] New: Remove explicit add/remove functions from IDBIndex
- Re: [IndexedDB] Syntax for opening a cursor
Sunday, 27 June 2010
Saturday, 26 June 2010
- [Bug 9790] Request is not a good suffix for all the async interfaces in IndexedDB
- Re: [IndexedDB] Atomic schema changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Computed indexes
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: [IndexedDB] Computed indexes
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBEvent and Event
- Re: [IndexedDB] Atomic schema changes
Friday, 25 June 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Atomic schema changes
- [IndexedDB] IDBEvent and Event
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- Re: [IndexedDB] Atomic schema changes
- Re: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- Re: [IndexedDB] Atomic schema changes
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
Thursday, 24 June 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Syntax for opening a cursor
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- [IndexedDB] Syntax for opening a cursor
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Thoughts on WebNotification
- Thoughts on WebNotification
- Re: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- ISSUE-117: In Widget P&C Spec, need to clarify in the spec that dir attribute does not apply to attributes that are IRIs, Numeric, Keywords, etc. The dir attribute only affects human readable strings.
- Re: [IndexedDB] Computed indexes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Computed indexes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Computed indexes
- [Bug 10007] New: Async callbacks should fire in the same order the async requests are made in IndexedDB.
- Re: [IndexedDB] Callback order
- Re: [IndexedDB] Atomic schema changes
- [IndexedDB] Atomic schema changes
Wednesday, 23 June 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Computed indexes
- [Bug 10000] New: Allow expressions in addition to keyPaths when creating indexes
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: Updates to File API
- [Bug 9989] New: Is the number of replacement characters supposed to be well-defined? If not this should be explicitly noted. If it is then more detail is required.
- RE: Updates to File API
- Re: Updates to File API
- RE: Updates to File API
Tuesday, 22 June 2010
- Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: [fileapi] urn -> URL
- RE: Updates to File API
- [indexedDB] spec update
- [Bug 9790] Request is not a good suffix for all the async interfaces in IndexedDB
Monday, 21 June 2010
- [Bug 9975] New: Mozilla async API proposal
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- [Bug 9973] New: If the entry's name is "sec-websocket-protocol" 0 please don't put normative requirements in parenthesis
Sunday, 20 June 2010
Saturday, 19 June 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Computed indexes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Callback order
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multi-value keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multi-value keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Callback order
- Re: [IndexedDB] Computed indexes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Callback order
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multi-value keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Callback order
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multi-value keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multi-value keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multi-value keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multi-value keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multi-value keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multi-value keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multi-value keys
- RE: [IndexedDB] Multi-value keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multi-value keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Multi-value keys
Friday, 18 June 2010
- [IndexedDB] Callback order
- [IndexedDB] Multi-value keys
- RE: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- Re: Widget Updates Standard
Thursday, 17 June 2010
- Re: State of Media Type Sniffing
- New mailing list for Web Performance
- Re: State of Media Type Sniffing
- [IndexedDB] Computed indexes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Posting lists/inverted indexes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: [IndexedDB] Posting lists/inverted indexes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: [IndexedDB] Posting lists/inverted indexes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Widget Updates Standard
- [Bug 9769] IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put should be split into 3 methods
- State of Media Type Sniffing
- [IndexedDB] Posting lists/inverted indexes
- [widgets] Draft minutes from 17 June 2010 voice conf
- [Bug 9769] IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put should be split into 3 methods
- [Bug 9768] Indexes should hang off of objectStores rather than the IDBDatabaseRequest/Sync objects
- [Bug 9563] The events passed to the event handlers are underspecified
Wednesday, 16 June 2010
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps — Proposed path forward
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- Re: [whatwg] Do we really need a <device> element?
- Re: where did input type=file end up?
- RE: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- where did input type=file end up?
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps — Proposed path forward
- File* specs: Please use public-webapps (exclusively) for all technical discussions
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps — Proposed path forward
- Re: CfC: Candidate Recommendation of XMLHttpRequest; deadline June 30
- [widgets] Draft agenda for 17 June 2010 voice conf
- Re: CfC: Candidate Recommendation of XMLHttpRequest; deadline June 30
- RE: Transferring File* to WebApps - Proposed path forward
- Transferring File* to WebApps — Proposed path forward
- RE: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- RE: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
Tuesday, 15 June 2010
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- RE: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- RE: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- RE: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- Re: [WebIDL] NoInterfaceObject and access to constants
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- Re: ACTION-438 Question about possibility of cross-site data sharing in Web Storage
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- RE: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
- [Bug 9888] Constants are not accessible when they're needed for most IndexedDB interfaces.
- [Bug 9903] Need to define specification and use of collations for string sorting
- [Bug 9903] Need to define specification and use of collations for string sorting
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Wanted: Editor for Web IDL spec
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- CfC: Candidate Recommendation of XMLHttpRequest; deadline June 30
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- [WebIDL] NoInterfaceObject and access to constants
- Re: ISSUE-90: Exposing more (~infinite) response headers [CORS]
- Re: [xhr] authorization
- Re: ACTION-438 Question about possibility of cross-site data sharing in Web Storage
- ACTION-438 Question about possibility of cross-site data sharing in Web Storage
- Re: ISSUE-90: Exposing more (~infinite) response headers [CORS]
- Re: [cors] Simplify CORS Headers (ISSUE-89)
- RE: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
Monday, 14 June 2010
- Re: IndexedDB - renaming
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: [xhr] authorization (was: Re: call for reviewers: XMLHttpRequest Last Call)
- Re: Updates to File API
- [Bug 9561] IDBRequest should inherit from EventTarget
- [Bug 9921] IDBIndexedDatabase should be called IDBFactory
- [Bug 9921] New: IDBIndexedDatabase should be called IDBFactory
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: Updates to File API
Sunday, 13 June 2010
Friday, 11 June 2010
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- RE: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: Updates to File API
- RE: Updates to File API
- RE: Updates to File API and blob url schemes
- Re: Updates to File API
- RE: Updates to File API
- Re: [IndexDB] Collation Algorithm?
- Re: IndexedDB - renaming
- [Bug 9791] IDBDatabase should (possibly) be renamed to IDBConnection
- Re: IndexedDB - renaming
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: [IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async API changes)
- RE: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
Thursday, 10 June 2010
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- RE: [IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async API changes)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Re: [Bug 9769] New: IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put should be split into 3 methods
- RE: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: [IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async API changes)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async API changes)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async API changes)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async API changes)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async API changes)
- RE: [IndexDB] Collation Algorithm?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async API changes)
- [Bug 9903] New: Need to define specification and use of collations for string sorting
- Re: [IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async API changes)
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [Bug 9823] New: Add "maxExecutionContexts" property with number of hardware execution contexts
- Re: IndexedDB - renaming
- Re: IndexedDB - renaming
- Re: IndexedDB - renaming
- Re: IndexedDB - renaming
- Re: [IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async API changes)
- Re: [Bug 9823] New: Add "maxExecutionContexts" property with number of hardware execution contexts
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- IndexedDB - renaming
- [Bug 9789] We should use the IDB prefix on all IndexedDB interfaces
- Re: HTML5 File
- Re: [IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async API changes)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async API changes)
- [IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async API changes)
- Regrets for today
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- RE: JS crypto pointer
- RE: [Bug 9823] New: Add "maxExecutionContexts" property with number of hardware execution contexts
Wednesday, 9 June 2010
- [IndexDB] Collation Algorithm?
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- IETF BoF @IETF-78 Maastricht: HASMAT - HTTP Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- RE: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- RfC: LCWD of API and Ontology for Media Resource 1.0; deadline 11 July 2010
- [Bug 9888] New: Constants are not accessible when they're needed for most IndexedDB interfaces.
- OFF TOPIC: SVG Progress Contest
- Re: JS crypto pointer
- JS crypto pointer
- Last Call Working Drafts transition announcement of the API and Ontology for Media Resource 1.0
Tuesday, 8 June 2010
- [WebTiming] Updates
- Re: [IndexedDB] Re: [Bug 9882] New: Behavior when attempting to write data to an objectStore opened as read only unspecified
- [IndexedDB] Re: [Bug 9882] New: Behavior when attempting to write data to an objectStore opened as read only unspecified
- RE: [Bug 9823] New: Add "maxExecutionContexts" property with number of hardware execution contexts
- [Bug 9882] New: Behavior when attempting to write data to an objectStore opened as read only unspecified
- Re: [admin] DVCS platform at W3C
- Re: [XHR2] Event Handler Attributes - onredirect
Monday, 7 June 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Status
- Re: [IndexedDB] Status
- Re: [admin] DVCS platform at W3C
- Re: [IndexedDB] Status
- Re: [IndexedDB] Status
- Re: [IndexedDB] Status
- [IndexedDB] Status
- Transferring File* to WebApps (was Re: HTML5 File)
- Re: HTML5 File
- Re: HTML5 File
Friday, 4 June 2010
- [XHR2] Event Handler Attributes - onredirect
- Re: HTML5 File
- Re: HTML5 File
- Re: HTML5 File
- Re: HTML5 File
Thursday, 3 June 2010
- RE: comments
- Re: Can IndexedDB depend on JavaScript? (WAS: [Bug 9793] New: Allow dates and floating point numbers in keys)
- RE: Can IndexedDB depend on JavaScript? (WAS: [Bug 9793] New: Allow dates and floating point numbers in keys)
- Re: HTML5 File
- Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
- Re: HTML5 File
- [widgets] Draft minutes 3 June 2010 voice conf
- RE: comments
- Re: HTML5 File
- Re: HTML5 File
- Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: Updates to File API
Wednesday, 2 June 2010
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: HTML5 File
- Re: HTML5 File
- Re: HTML5 File
- Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
- Re: HTML5 File
- Re: HTML5 File
- Re: HTML5 File
- Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
- Re: HTML5 File
- [Bug 9832] New: keyPath is underspecified
- Re: [IndexedDB] KeyPaths and missing properties.
- [Bug 9698] Rename all instances of noOverwrite to overwite
- Re: [IndexedDB] [Bug 9562] New: Opening a database with a different description is underspecified
- Re: comments
- [widgets] Draft agenda for 3 June 2010 voice conf
Tuesday, 1 June 2010
Wednesday, 2 June 2010
- Re: Automatic translation/validation of WebIDL documents
- Re: Reminder: Seeking comments on LCWDs of Server-events, Web Storage, Web Workers; deadline 30-June-2010
- Automatic translation/validation of WebIDL documents
- Reminder: Seeking comments on LCWDs of Server-events, Web Storage, Web Workers; deadline 30-June-2010
- Re: JSON-LD - Universal Linked Data markup for Web Services
Monday, 31 May 2010
Sunday, 30 May 2010
Friday, 28 May 2010
- [Bug 9823] New: Add "maxExecutionContexts" property with number of hardware execution contexts
- Re: comments
- Re: comments
- Re: [widgets PC] i18n comment 23: i18n string
- RE: [widgets PC] i18n comment 20 : Misuse of xml:lang for localization flag
- [widgets PC] i18n comment 21: Language tag case
- [widgets PC] i18n comment 23: i18n string
- [widgets PC] i18n comment 22: Default content
- [widgets PC] i18n comment 21: i18n string
Thursday, 27 May 2010
- comments
- [widgets] Draft minutes from 27 May 2010 voice conf
- Re: [widgets PC] i18n comment 18 : Empty dir value
- Re: [widgets PC] i18n comment 15 : Persian dir examples
- Re: [widgets PC] i18n comment 19 : Corrupted Chinese text
Wednesday, 26 May 2010
- RE: [cors] Simplify CORS Headers (ISSUE-89)
- Re: [cors] Simplify CORS Headers (ISSUE-89)
- Re: [cors] Simplify CORS Headers (ISSUE-89)
- Re: [widgets PC] i18n comment 17 : What ITS did
- [widgets] Draft agenda for 27 May 2010 voice conf
Tuesday, 25 May 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Re: [Bug 9769] New: IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put should be split into 3 methods
- Re: Can IndexedDB depend on JavaScript? (WAS: [Bug 9793] New: Allow dates and floating point numbers in keys)
- Reminder: RfC: 11-May-2010 LCWD of Digital Signatures for Widgets spec; deadline 1 June 2010
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
Monday, 24 May 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] [Bug 9562] New: Opening a database with a different description is underspecified
- Re: Can IndexedDB depend on JavaScript? (WAS: [Bug 9793] New: Allow dates and floating point numbers in keys)
- Re: Can IndexedDB depend on JavaScript? (WAS: [Bug 9793] New: Allow dates and floating point numbers in keys)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Re: [Bug 9769] New: IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put should be split into 3 methods
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: Can IndexedDB depend on JavaScript? (WAS: [Bug 9793] New: Allow dates and floating point numbers in keys)
- RE: [cors] Simplify CORS Headers (ISSUE-89)
- Re: Can IndexedDB depend on JavaScript? (WAS: [Bug 9793] New: Allow dates and floating point numbers in keys)
Sunday, 23 May 2010
Saturday, 22 May 2010
- Can IndexedDB depend on JavaScript? (WAS: [Bug 9793] New: Allow dates and floating point numbers in keys)
- [Bug 9796] New: IndexedDB's async interface should be available within workers
- Re: [IndexedDB] Re: [Bug 9769] New: IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put should be split into 3 methods
- Re: [IndexedDB] Re: [Bug 9769] New: IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put should be split into 3 methods
Friday, 21 May 2010
- [Bug 9793] New: Allow dates and floating point numbers in keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- [Bug 9791] New: IDBDatabase should (possibly) be renamed to IDBConnection
- [Bug 9790] New: Request is not a good suffix for all the async interfaces in IndexedDB
- [Bug 9789] New: We should use the IDB prefix on all IDB interfaces
- Re: Re: ENISA Smartphone security study
- Re: [IndexedDB] WebSimpleDB in the bug tracker
- Re: [IndexedDB] WebSimpleDB in the bug tracker
- [Bug 9786] New: WebIDL bugs in IndexedDB spec
- Re: IndexedDB WebIDL bugs
- Re: Updates to File API
- IndexedDB WebIDL bugs
Thursday, 20 May 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] KeyPaths and missing properties.
- RE: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- [widgets PC] i18n comment 15 : Persian dir examples
- [widgets PC] i18n comment 20 : Misuse of xml:lang for localization flag
- [widgets PC] i18n comment 19 : Corrupted Chinese text
- [widgets PC] i18n comment 18 : Empty dir value
- [widgets PC] i18n comment 17 : What ITS did
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] KeyPaths and missing properties.
- Re: [IndexedDB] KeyPaths and missing properties.
- Re: [IndexedDB] KeyPaths and missing properties.
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- [widgets] Draft minutes from 20 May 2010 voice conf
- Re: PFWG comments on View Mode Media Feature
- RE: [widgets] rename View Mode Media Feature spec
- Re: RfC: Three Last Call WDs by the XML Security WG; deadline 11-May-2010
- Re: ENISA Smartphone security study
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] KeyPaths and missing properties.
- RE: ENISA Smartphone security study
- Re: [IndexedDB] KeyPaths and missing properties.
- Re: [IndexedDB] KeyPaths and missing properties.
Wednesday, 19 May 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] KeyPaths and missing properties.
- Re: ENISA Smartphone security study
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] KeyPaths and missing properties.
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: ENISA Smartphone security study
- PFWG comments on View Mode Media Feature
- ENISA Smartphone security study
- Re: [widgets] rename View Mode Media Feature spec
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [widgets] rename View Mode Media Feature spec
- [IndexedDB] Re: [Bug 9769] New: IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put should be split into 3 methods
- Re: [widgets] rename View Mode Media Feature spec
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- [widgets] Draft agenda for 20 May 2010 voice conf
- Re: Updates to File API
- [Bug 9769] New: IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put should be split into 3 methods
- [Bug 9768] New: Indexes should hang off of objectStores rather than the IDBDatabaseRequest/Sync objects
- [IndexedDB] WebSimpleDB in the bug tracker
- Re: [IndexedDB] KeyPaths and missing properties.
- Re: [widgets] rename View Mode Media Feature spec
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: Updates to File API
- [IndexedDB] KeyPaths and missing properties.
- Re: Updates to File API
Tuesday, 18 May 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- [Bug 9766] New: We should expose the subprotocol for the case of the client not specifying one but the server specifying one
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
- Re: [widgets] rename View Mode Media Feature spec
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes
- [widgets] rename View Mode Media Feature spec
- [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes
Monday, 17 May 2010
- Re: Updates to File API
- RfC: Three Last Call WDs by the XML Security WG; deadline 11-May-2010
- [Bug 9745] New: We should require nextprotoneg support when doing the TLS handshake for WebSocket.
- Re: Pre-LC Review Requested: System Information API
Sunday, 16 May 2010
Saturday, 15 May 2010
Friday, 14 May 2010
- Re: [whatwg] New File attributes creationDate, modificationDate and size
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- [Bug 9739] New: Editorial review from timeless on March 24, 2010
- [Bug 9738] New: Improve IDL documentation
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: [cors] Simplify CORS Headers (ISSUE-89)
- Re: [cors] Simplify CORS Headers (ISSUE-89)
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: Client side JavaScript i18n API
- RE: JS crypto?
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: widget example of CORS and UMP
- RE: Client side JavaScript i18n API
- widget example of CORS and UMP
- Re: Client side JavaScript i18n API
Thursday, 13 May 2010
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: [cors] Set-Cookie / Referer / NTML / cache
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: CORS suggestions [Was: Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest]
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: JS crypto?
- Re: JS crypto?
- Re: JS crypto?
- Last Word-ism (was: Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest)
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: Updates to File API
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: Updates to File API
- CORS suggestions [Was: Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest]
- Updates to File API
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: [cors] Simplify CORS Headers (ISSUE-89)
- Re: [cors] Set-Cookie / Referer / NTML / cache
- Re: Pre-LC Review Requested: System Information API
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
Wednesday, 12 May 2010
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: CORS Header Filtering?
- Re: [cors] Set-Cookie / Referer / NTML / cache
- Re: CORS Header Filtering?
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: CORS Header Filtering?
- Re: CORS Header Filtering?
- Re: CORS Header Filtering?
- Re: CORS Header Filtering?
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: CORS Header Filtering?
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: CORS Header Filtering?
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- CORS Header Filtering?
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- [IndexedDB] What happens when the version changes?
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- RE: JS crypto?
- Re: JS crypto?
- Re: JS crypto?
- JS crypto?
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- [widgets] No call on 13 May 2010; next call is 20 May
- Re: [whatwg] New File attributes creationDate, modificationDate and size
- Re: [cors] Set-Cookie / Referer / NTML / cache
- Re: Pre-LC Review Requested: System Information API
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [whatwg] New File attributes creationDate, modificationDate and size
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
Tuesday, 11 May 2010
- Re: [widgets] WARP testing
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [cors] Set-Cookie / Referer / NTML / cache
- Re: Pre-LC Review Requested: System Information API
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [whatwg] New File attributes creationDate, modificationDate and size
- Re: [IndexedDB] Asynchronous inline key generation for autoIncrement'ing objectStores
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changes to IDBRequest and specification of the success and error events
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [IndexedDB] Asynchronous inline key generation for autoIncrement'ing objectStores
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [widgets] WARP testing
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [whatwg] New File attributes creationDate, modificationDate and size
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [IndexedDB] Asynchronous inline key generation for autoIncrement'ing objectStores
- [IndexedDB] Asynchronous inline key generation for autoIncrement'ing objectStores
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Client-side cross origin
- Re: Pre-LC Review Requested: System Information API
- Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations
- Re: [widgets] WARP testing
- Re: Pre-LC Review Requested: System Information API
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- RfC: 11-May-2010 LCWD of Digital Signatures for Widgets spec; deadline 1 June 2010
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: [widgets] WARP testing
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Reminder: Request for Comments: LCWD of View Mode Media Feature; deadline 18 May 2010
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback
- Re: [xhr2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
Monday, 10 May 2010
- Re: Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Chromium's support for CORS and UMP
- Re: CORS Questions
- CORS Questions
- Re: Pre-LC Review Requested: System Information API
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback
- Re: [xhr2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- [Bug 9698] New: Rename all instances of noOverwrite to overwite
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback
- Re: Quick review of RDFa DOM API?
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback
- Re: Pre-LC Review Requested: System Information API
Saturday, 8 May 2010
Friday, 7 May 2010
Monday, 10 May 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changes to IDBRequest and specification of the success and error events
- Re: Pre-LC Review Requested: System Information API
- [xhr2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: Pre-LC Review Requested: System Information API
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
Friday, 7 May 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- [IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put
- Re: [cors] Set-Cookie / Referer / NTML / cache
- [cors] Set-Cookie / Referer / NTML / cache
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- [cors] Simplify CORS Headers (ISSUE-89)
Thursday, 6 May 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- [IndexedDB] Changes to IDBRequest and specification of the success and error events
- Re: Status of Selectors API Level 1 Candidate
- Re: Status of Selectors API Level 1 Candidate
- [widgets] Draft minutes from 6 May 2010 voice conf
- Re: Minor DigSig feedback
- Re: Minor DigSig feedback
- Re: Minor DigSig feedback
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- Re: [widgets] WARP default policy
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
Wednesday, 5 May 2010
- Re: Client side JavaScript i18n API
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- Re: Pre-LC Review Requested: System Information API
- Re: Seeking implementation data for XBL2
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- Re: Pre-LC Review Requested: System Information API
- Re: Status of Selectors API Level 1 Candidate
- Minor DigSig feedback
- Pre-LC Review Requested: System Information API
- Re: how to use the access element?
- Re: DigSig feedback
- Re: Seeking implementation data for XBL2
- Re: Status of Selectors API Level 1 Candidate
- Re: [widgets] WARP default policy
- Re: [widgets] WARP default policy
- Re: [widgets] WARP default policy
- DigSig feedback
- Re: Quick review of RDFa DOM API?
- Re: Quick review of RDFa DOM API?
- Seeking implementation data for XBL2
- Re: Status of Selectors API Level 1 Candidate
- how to use the access element?
- Re: [widgets] WARP default policy
- Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations
- Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- Re: [widgets] WARP default policy
- [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
Tuesday, 4 May 2010
- Re: [widgets] WARP default policy
- Re: [widgets] WARP default policy
- Re: [widgets] WARP default policy
- Re: [widgets] WARP default policy
- [widgets] WARP default policy
- [Bug 9653] New: How to handle nullable violations is not specified.
- Re: Client side JavaScript i18n API
- Re: [widgets] WARP testing
- Re: [widgets] Moving to DVCS platform Re: [admin] DVCS platform at W3C
- Re: [widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources
- Re: [widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources
- Re: [widgets] Moving to DVCS platform Re: [admin] DVCS platform at W3C
- Re: [widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources
- Re: [widgets] Moving to DVCS platform Re: [admin] DVCS platform at W3C
- Re: [widgets] Moving to DVCS platform Re: [admin] DVCS platform at W3C
- [widgets] Draft agenda for 6 May 2010 voice conf
- Re: [widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources
- Re: [widgets] Moving to DVCS platform Re: [admin] DVCS platform at W3C
- Re: [widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources
- [widgets] Moving to DVCS platform Re: [admin] DVCS platform at W3C
- Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations
- Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations
- [widgets] W3C Widgets on Android (was:Zip vs GZip Tar)
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
Monday, 3 May 2010
Sunday, 2 May 2010
Saturday, 1 May 2010
Friday, 30 April 2010
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [widgets] Span example
- Re: Review of update to Widget Signature
- Review of update to Widget Signature
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: Re: can we extend some html file as resource in a widget?
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
- Re:Re: can we extend some html file as resource in a widget?
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Digital Signatures for Widgets; deadline 6 May 2010
Thursday, 29 April 2010
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Digital Signatures for Widgets; deadline 6 May 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: StorageEvent.url (WAS: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob)
- Re: StorageEvent.url (WAS: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob)
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Digital Signatures for Widgets; deadline 6 May 2010
- Re: StorageEvent.url (WAS: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob)
- Re: StorageEvent.url (WAS: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob)
- [admin] DVCS platform at W3C
- Re: can we extend some html file as resource in a widget?
- StorageEvent.url (WAS: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob)
- Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Digital Signatures for Widgets; deadline 6 May 2010
- can we extend some html file as resource in a widget?
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
Monday, 26 April 2010
Wednesday, 28 April 2010
- Re: Client side JavaScript i18n API
- Re: [WebTiming] Exporting flattened DOMTiming data
- Re: [WebTiming] Exporting flattened DOMTiming data
Thursday, 29 April 2010
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
Wednesday, 28 April 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- RE: Client side JavaScript i18n API
- Re: Client side JavaScript i18n API
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: Client side JavaScript i18n API
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar
- FileWriter updated
Tuesday, 27 April 2010
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: Client side JavaScript i18n API
- RE: Client side JavaScript i18n API
- Re: Client side JavaScript i18n API
- Re: Client side JavaScript i18n API
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: [WebTiming] Exporting flattened DOMTiming data
- Re: Client side JavaScript i18n API
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- [WebTiming] Exporting flattened DOMTiming data
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
Monday, 26 April 2010
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- XMLHttpRequest.responseBlob
- Re: FileReader question about ProgressEvent
- Re: FileReader question about ProgressEvent
- Re: FileReader question about ProgressEvent
- Re: FileReader question about ProgressEvent
- Re: Client side JavaScript i18n API
- RE: Client side JavaScript i18n API
- JTC1-SC 34/W3C [ISO ZIP] Work Item proposal for ISO ZIP
- Re: Client side JavaScript i18n API
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: Client side JavaScript i18n API
- Re: [IndexedDB/WebIDL] Dates + Sorting (WAS: Detailed comments for the current draft)
Friday, 23 April 2010
- Client side JavaScript i18n API
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
Thursday, 22 April 2010
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [IndexedDB] Explaining Asynchronous event-style interface
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [WebNotifications] omnibus feedback reply, new draft
- Re: [WebNotifications] omnibus feedback reply, new draft
- [IndexedDB/WebIDL] Dates + Sorting (WAS: Detailed comments for the current draft)
- Re: [WebNotifications] omnibus feedback reply, new draft
- Re: [WebNotifications] omnibus feedback reply, new draft
- [WebNotifications] omnibus feedback reply, new draft
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [IndexedDB] Dynamic Transactions (WAS: Lots of small nits and clarifying questions)
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- 22 April VC is Canceled! [Was: Re: [widgets] Draft agenda for 22 April 2010 voice conf]
- [widgets] Call for Implementation: WARP spec
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- RE: [IndexedDB] Dynamic Transactions (WAS: Lots of small nits and clarifying questions)
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [IndexedDB] Dynamic Transactions (WAS: Lots of small nits and clarifying questions)
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [IndexedDB] Dynamic Transactions (WAS: Lots of small nits and clarifying questions)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Dynamic Transactions (WAS: Lots of small nits and clarifying questions)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Dynamic Transactions (WAS: Lots of small nits and clarifying questions)
Wednesday, 21 April 2010
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Bug/enhancement requests
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [IndexedDB] Bug/enhancement requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] Bug/enhancement requests
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- [widgets] Draft agenda for 22 April 2010 voice conf
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
Tuesday, 20 April 2010
- Re: FileReader question about ProgressEvent
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- FileReader question about ProgressEvent
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- [Bug 9563] New: The events passed to the event handlers are underspecified
- Re: [IndexedDB] Bug/enhancement requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] Bug/enhancement requests
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- [Bug 9562] New: Opening a database with a different description is underspecified
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- [Bug 9561] New: IDBRequest should inherit from EventTarget
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: Request for Comments: LCWD of View Mode Media Feature; deadline 18 May 2010
- Request for Comments: LCWD of View Mode Media Feature; deadline 18 May 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Bug/enhancement requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- [Bug 9557] New: Could we get Mouse Capture via Javascript?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Dynamic Transactions (WAS: Lots of small nits and clarifying questions)
- [IndexedDB] Bug/enhancement requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Dynamic Transactions (WAS: Lots of small nits and clarifying questions)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
Monday, 19 April 2010
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
Sunday, 18 April 2010
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
Saturday, 17 April 2010
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
Friday, 16 April 2010
- Request for Comments: LCWD of Digital Signatures for Widgets; deadline 6 May 2010
- Re: can we develop a w3c widget engine for the webkit?
- Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
- Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
- Re: can we develop a w3c widget engine for the webkit?
- Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
- can we develop a w3c widget engine for the webkit?
- Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
Thursday, 15 April 2010
- [widgets] Draft minutes for 15 April 2010 voice conf
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request: widget URI scheme
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request: widget URI scheme
- Re: [widgets] URI spec: Note for authors
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec
- Re: Websockets API / CloseEvent and readyState
Wednesday, 14 April 2010
- Re: Websockets API / CloseEvent and readyState
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec
- Re: Websockets API / CloseEvent and readyState
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: Websockets API / CloseEvent and readyState
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
- [widgets] Draft agenda for 15 April 2010 voice conf
- Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
- FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?
Tuesday, 13 April 2010
- Re: Not making partial result available during FileReader.readAsText()?
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
- XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
- Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec
- Re: VMMF updated
- [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas
- Re: Server Sent Events vs Web Sockets?
- Re: Not making partial result available during FileReader.readAsText()?
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
Monday, 12 April 2010
- Re: Not making partial result available during FileReader.readAsText()?
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: DOM 2 Views
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: DOM 2 Views
- Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec
- Re: Server Sent Events vs Web Sockets?
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: Server Sent Events vs Web Sockets?
- Server Sent Events vs Web Sockets?
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec
- Re: Comments on View Modes
- VMMF updated
- Re: DOM 2 Views
- Re: VMMF - new version
- Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17
- DOM 2 Views
- Re: Comments on View Modes
- Re: Application and Chrome
- Re: Application and Chrome
- Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec
Saturday, 10 April 2010
- Re: Not making partial result available during FileReader.readAsText()?
- Re: Not making partial result available during FileReader.readAsText()?
- Re: Not making partial result available during FileReader.readAsText()?
Friday, 9 April 2010
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Re: [WARP] comment on subdomains
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Not making partial result available during FileReader.readAsText()?
- Ordering of error/load and loadend events for FileReader
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
- Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
Thursday, 8 April 2010
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- [widgets] Please review Updated Digital Signatures for Widgets spec
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Updated Digital Signatures for Widgets Editors Draft
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- [widgets] Draft minutes from 8 April 2010 voice conf
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Re: [widgets] Draft agenda for 8 April 2010 voice conf
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
Wednesday, 7 April 2010
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Re: CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- CORS Last Call status/plans? [Was: Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call]
- Re: Widget Signature modification proposal (revised)
- Re: Widget Signature modification proposal (revised)
- [widgets] Draft agenda for 8 April 2010 voice conf
- Re: Re: Widget Signature modification proposal (revised)
- Re: Widget Signature modification proposal (revised)
- Re: Widget Signature modification proposal (revised)
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Re: Widget Signature modification proposal (revised)
- Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Widget Signature modification proposal (revised)
Tuesday, 6 April 2010
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
- [UMP] Request for Last Call
- Re: i18n comments:
- Re: i18n comments: (was: [widgets] Span example)
- Re: i18n comments: (was: [widgets] Span example)
- Re: i18n comments: (was: [widgets] Span example)
- [widgets] Re: i18n comments:
- Re: [widgets] Korean text corrupted
- Re: Widget Signature Issue and Proposed Resolution
Monday, 5 April 2010
Saturday, 3 April 2010
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?