Re: IndexedDB - renaming

Also, we need to redirect from the CVS version of the draft to the Mercurial version, since we are going to be maintaining only the Mercurial version. This version can be found at:

http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html

Nikunj
On Jun 10, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:

> Arg, drats, I missed the "planning" part of your email :)
> 
> Sounds good to me, the only thing I would add is that I think we
> should remove the base-interfaces, like IDBObjectStore, and copy the
> relevant properties to both (async and sync) sub-interfaces.
> 
> / Jonas
> 
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
>> I still see the old "Request" post-fixed names when looking at
>> 
>> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/IndexedDB/#async-api
>> 
>> Despite the top of the file saying that this is the June 10th version.
>> Is there somewhere else I should look?
>> 
>> / Jonas
>> 
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> A while ago, we discussed some simple renaming of the IndexedDB
>>> interfaces. I have already closed
>>> 
>>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9789
>>> 
>>> as it was a very simple fix. I would like to recap the rest of the
>>> changes I am planning to make, just to make sure that everyone is ok
>>> with them:
>>> 
>>> 1. Drop the "Request" prefix from our async interface names and add
>>> the "Sync" suffix to the sync interfaces.
>>> 
>>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9790
>>> 
>>> 2. Rename IDBIndexedDatabase to IDBFactory. My original proposal was
>>> also renaming IDBDatabase to IDBConnection but Jonas had an objection
>>> to that. So let's keep it IDBDatabase for now.
>>> 
>>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9791
>>> 
>>> What do you think?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andrei
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>

Received on Thursday, 10 June 2010 17:32:55 UTC