W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 11:08:59 +0200
To: marcosc@opera.com, "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Tyler Close" <tyler.close@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <op.vav009ke64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:44:07 +0200, Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com>  
> Since then, both CORS and UMP have changed so that UMP is now a subset
> of CORS. Since advocacy of CORS includes agreement with this subset,
> absent a third position, UMP is the mutually agreed subset of the two
> camps.

If it is a subset though and nobody intends on implementing it it makes no  
sense to go forward with it.

> Sorry. I meant
> From the feedback we've received on UMP, for those issues that CORS
> has in common with UMP, it seems clear that the UMP draft's
> documentation of these issues is clearer and more readily understood
> than the CORS draft.

This is misleading and false:


Anne van Kesteren
Received on Friday, 9 April 2010 09:09:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:06 UTC