- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 17:10:17 +0200
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org> wrote: > Comment from the i18n review of: > http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/ > > Comment 17 > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0907-widgets-pc/ > Editorial/substantive: E > Tracked by: RI > > Location in reviewed document: > Changes since last pubn [http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/] > > Comment: > I propose: > > > "which is what ITS did" => "which is how ITS tags were formerly specified here" > > > The ITS specification doesn't require use of a namespace, and it would be good to change this wording so that that idea is not incorrectly reinforced. Fixed. -- Marcos Caceres Opera Software ASA, http://www.opera.com/ http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 15:11:11 UTC