Re: [IndexedDB] Interaction between transactions and objects that allow multiple operations from Shawn Wilsher on 2010-05-05 (public-webapps@w3.org from April to June 2010)

From: Shawn Wilsher <sdwilsh@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 13:56:15 -0700
To: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>
CC: Pablo Castro <Pablo.Castro@microsoft.com>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4BE1DB6F.8030707@mozilla.com>

On 5/5/2010 1:09 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> I'd also worry that if creating the transaction were completely transparent
> to the user that they might not think to close it either.  (I'm mainly
> thinking about copy-and-paste coders here.)
I should have been more clear.  That statement goes along with the 
suggestion to make everything work off of a transaction - object stores, 
indexes, cursors, etc.  They'd have to know about the transaction 
because they'd have to use it.

Cheers,

Shawn

Attachments

application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:54:54 UTC