- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:33:30 -0400
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
The draft minutes from the April 15 Widgets voice conference are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2010/04/15-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before April 22 (the next Widgets voice conference); otherwise these minutes will be considered Approved. -Regards, Art Barstow [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - Widgets Voice Conference 15 Apr 2010 [2]Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ 2010AprJun/0124.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2010/04/15-wam-irc Attendees Present Art, Josh, StevenP, Frederick, Frederick_Hirsch, Robin, Arve Regrets Marcos, Bryan Chair Art Scribe Art Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]Review and tweak agenda 2. [6]Announcements 3. [7]View Modes Media Features spec 4. [8]View Modes Interfaces spec 5. [9]AoB * [10]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ <scribe> Scribe: Art <scribe> ScribeNick: ArtB Review and tweak agenda AB: the draft agenda was submitted yesterday ( [11]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010AprJun/01 24.html ). Any requests for changes? [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ 2010AprJun/0124.html [ None ] Announcements AB: I have two; first is that Widget Updates WD was published April 13 ( [12]http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-widgets-updates-20100413/ ) ... 2nd is that Digital Signatures for Widgets LC will be published today; May 6 is deadline for comments ... any other annoucements? [12] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-widgets-updates-20100413/ View Modes Media Features spec AB: Robin has responded to all of the pre-LC comments and updated the ED accordingly ( [13]http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/ ). As such, I think the spec is ready for LC publication. Any comments? ... proposed RESOLUTION: the group agrees the View Modes Media Features spec is ready for LC publication ... any comments or objections? ... any voices of support? ... I support this spec moving to LC [13] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/ RB: I support this RESOLUTION: the group agrees the View Modes Media Features spec is ready for LC publication AB: Marcos told me offline that he support LC of this spec ... re which WGs we should ask to review, are there any groups other than CSS WG? ... does anyone know about BONDI? RB: don't know but we can ask AB: I will include BONDI in the list of review groups ... re the review period length, the minimum is 3 weeks but since this is the first LC and we want review from others, I think 4 weeks would be the minimum. <darobin> +1 SP: this is an HCG area ... should ask them and adjust the time accordingly AB: I'm OK but don't want it to be too openended SP: right, so ask them something like "is 4 weeks OK?" AB: that's OK with me <Steven> How many pages is it? AB: is 4 a good number or do we need it longer RB: I think 4 is fine since it is a smallish spec and CSS WG already reviewed it once AB: good points ... I'll use 4 weeks in my proposal to HCG <Steven> In that case 4 weeks will be fine RB: it's about 5 pages including all of the boilerplate stuff <scribe> ACTION: berjon notify Art when the VMMF LC is ready for a publication request [recorded in [14]http://www.w3.org/2010/04/15-wam-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Created ACTION-524 - Notify Art when the VMMF LC is ready for a publication request [on Robin Berjon - due 2010-04-22]. RB: OK, but we need agreement on the short name AB: good point ... so now it is widgets-vmmf? RB: right AB: one option is vmmf, another is view-mode ... I am mostly indifferent SP: something that is readable is good AB: how about view-mode? RB: OK <darobin> view-modes RB: use view-modes ... no, make that "view-mode" AB: any objections to "view-mode" <timeless> what's the reason for singular? RB: want singular because media feature in CSS is singular JS: OK AB: let's consider that agreed "view-mode" <scribe> ACTION: barstow submit TransReq for VMMF LC and ask groups to review it; use "view-mode" as new shortname [recorded in [15]http://www.w3.org/2010/04/15-wam-minutes.html#action02] <trackbot> Created ACTION-525 - Submit TransReq for VMMF LC and ask groups to review it; use "view-mode" as new shortname [on Arthur Barstow - due 2010-04-22]. View Modes Interfaces spec AB: earlier this week Anne van Kestern (the Editor of the CSSOM spec) asked us for "use case example" for the CSSOM spec ([16]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010AprJun/0 105.html ). Consider this a request for *everyone* to submit use case examples. ... this is a reasonable request and we should submit use cases as soon as we can ... one process related issue here is the mail list to use: www-style, public-webapps or cross-post. I generally don't like cross-posting but think that's appropriate ATM since currently there isn't yet agreement on the work split with the CSS WG. ... going forward www-style will be used for CSSOM discussions since the precedence is already set ... Marcos made a proposal re CSSOM's stlyeMedia.matchMedium usage ( [17]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010AprJun/00 71.html ). There has been some follow-up. ... anything today on this? [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ 2010AprJun/0105.html [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ 2010AprJun/0071.html RB: think we should continue to hash this out on the list AB: I agree with that <darobin> +1 AB: we do loose some control if our use cases are addressed by a CSS WG spec ... but they have the right expertise so I think this is good ... any concerns? [ No concerns raised ] AB: this gives us all the continued action to work with AvK and the CSS WG ... anything else on VM Interfaces for today? ... I don't know if we will have anything left in the VM-I spec RB: that's good AB: agree AoB AB: anything else for today? ... thanks Robin for following up on the URI scheme disussions RB: sure; hopefully we can close that soon AB: next call is April 22; there will not be a call on April 29 ... meeting adjourned Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: barstow submit TransReq for VMMF LC and ask groups to review it; use "view-mode" as new shortname [recorded in [18]http://www.w3.org/2010/04/15-wam-minutes.html#action02] [NEW] ACTION: berjon notify Art when the VMMF LC is ready for a publication request [recorded in [19]http://www.w3.org/2010/04/15-wam-minutes.html#action01] [End of minutes]
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2010 13:34:21 UTC