W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:02:15 -0700
Cc: marcosc@opera.com, "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-id: <F59E68E1-4797-4635-AD01-9BD36CB6B5D1@apple.com>
To: Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com>

On Apr 8, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Tyler Close wrote:

> Reading between the lines, and please correct me if I'm mistaken, I
> suspect what you're really saying is that you don't want two specs to
> exist and you feel committed to CORS.

I'm saying the latter, but not the former. So long as UMP is a subset  
of CORS according to an objective standard we all agree on, and so  
long as we have done due diligence to conform this, I have no personal  
objection to advancing it. Note: I do not believe this is currently  
true, but I believe we could easily make it true.

The purpose of my message was to note that the UMP spec is unlikely to  
factor directly into Apple's plans, since there was a specific  
question about implementor interest. I do not mean to imply that  
Apple's level of interest should be the deciding factor.

Received on Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:02:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:06 UTC