- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:02:15 -0700
- To: Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com>
- Cc: marcosc@opera.com, "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Apr 8, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Tyler Close wrote: > > > Reading between the lines, and please correct me if I'm mistaken, I > suspect what you're really saying is that you don't want two specs to > exist and you feel committed to CORS. I'm saying the latter, but not the former. So long as UMP is a subset of CORS according to an objective standard we all agree on, and so long as we have done due diligence to conform this, I have no personal objection to advancing it. Note: I do not believe this is currently true, but I believe we could easily make it true. The purpose of my message was to note that the UMP spec is unlikely to factor directly into Apple's plans, since there was a specific question about implementor interest. I do not mean to imply that Apple's level of interest should be the deciding factor. Regards, Maciej
Received on Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:02:47 UTC