Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call

On Apr 8, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Tyler Close wrote:

> Reading between the lines, and please correct me if I'm mistaken, I
> suspect what you're really saying is that you don't want two specs to
> exist and you feel committed to CORS.

I'm saying the latter, but not the former. So long as UMP is a subset  
of CORS according to an objective standard we all agree on, and so  
long as we have done due diligence to conform this, I have no personal  
objection to advancing it. Note: I do not believe this is currently  
true, but I believe we could easily make it true.

The purpose of my message was to note that the UMP spec is unlikely to  
factor directly into Apple's plans, since there was a specific  
question about implementor interest. I do not mean to imply that  
Apple's level of interest should be the deciding factor.


Received on Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:02:47 UTC