Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:

> A draft of the proposed API is here:
>
> http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfs2skx2_4g3s5f857


I just noticed another nit.  Your proposal says "interface IDBIndex { }; //
Unchanged" but the spec's IDBIndex interface includes "readonly attribute
DOMString storeName <#widl-IDBIndex-storeName>;" which is the owning object
store's name.  This param is probably no longer necessary now that indexes
hang off of objectStores (and thus it's pretty clear which one an index
is associated with).

J