Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?

>
> > [Constructor] interface FormData { Blob toBlob (); void append(DOMString
>> > name, Blob value); void append(DOMString name, DOMString value); };
>> > Also it looks like BlobBuilder (in the draft dimich linked to) is
>> lacking a
>> > means for the caller to set the type attribute of the blob being built.
>> > A couple ways that could be provided...
>> > [Constructor] interface BlobBuilder { attribute DOMString endings;
>> > attribute DOMString type; // option a
>> > Blob getBlob (in DOMString type); // option b void append (in DOMString
>> > text) raises (FileException); void append (in Blob data); };
>>
>> I don't feel strongly, but "option b" looks cleaner to me. Might want
>> to make the argument optional though, and default to the empty string.
>>
>
> Option b works for me and agreed it should be optional with empty being the
> default value.
>

I prefer option b as well.  (Especially if there'll be a use case where
users want to change the 'type' each time they call getBlob())

What will be the default type of Blob when it's not specified?

In this generally agreed proposal, if we append a blob made by FormData to
another FormData, we will be getting a nested multipart data, right?

Thanks,
Kinuko