W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:54:14 +0200
To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Tyler Close" <tyler.close@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <op.vasdsoif64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:12:33 +0200, Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com>  
> I've uploaded a new draft of the Uniform Messaging Policy to:
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/UMP/
> This version adopts the same redirect handling specified by CORS. With
> this change I believe there are no outstanding issues with UMP.
> The latest version also includes clarifications on the use of HTTP
> caching in uniform requests, as well as the prohibition of client
> authenticated connections for uniform requests. Both of these changes
> reflect clarifications discussed on the list.
> I believe the current editor's draft of UMP reflects all feedback
> received on the FPWD and is ready to proceed to Last Call.

Since this is just a superset of CORS I wonder why we need it. Are there  
any vendors considering dropping support for CORS in favor of just  
supporting UMP?

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 09:55:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:06 UTC