Re: [UMP] Request for Last Call

On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:12:33 +0200, Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com>  
wrote:
> I've uploaded a new draft of the Uniform Messaging Policy to:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/UMP/
>
> This version adopts the same redirect handling specified by CORS. With
> this change I believe there are no outstanding issues with UMP.
>
> The latest version also includes clarifications on the use of HTTP
> caching in uniform requests, as well as the prohibition of client
> authenticated connections for uniform requests. Both of these changes
> reflect clarifications discussed on the list.
>
> I believe the current editor's draft of UMP reflects all feedback
> received on the FPWD and is ready to proceed to Last Call.

Since this is just a superset of CORS I wonder why we need it. Are there  
any vendors considering dropping support for CORS in favor of just  
supporting UMP?


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 09:55:09 UTC